CAPLAKI v. MUKANYIRINKWAYA
Umujyi wa Kigali is allowed to intervene voluntarily because it was not a party in lower courts and has a direct legal interest; such intervention does not alter the commercial nature of the dispute, which is based on contractual obligations between CAPLAKI and Mukanyirinkwaya.
- Citation
- RLR V.2-2018
- Parties
- Applicant: Koperative CAPLAKI; Respondent: Mukanyirinkwaya Adèle; Voluntary Intervener: Umujyi wa Kigali
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2016
- Case Number
- RCOMAA0043/14/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Appeal / Preliminary Ruling on Voluntary Intervention
- Outcome
- preliminary objection dismissed; voluntary intervention allowed; main hearing to continue
- Legal Topics
- Voluntary Intervention, Change of Case Nature, Contractual Obligations, Government Property
- Source Language
- en, rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Koperative CAPLAKI
Applicant
Mukanyirinkwaya Adèle
Respondent
Umujyi wa Kigali
Voluntary Intervener
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Preliminary Ruling on Voluntary Intervention
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether voluntary intervention by Umujyi wa Kigali should be allowed at Supreme Court level
- 2 Whether such intervention changes the nature of the case from commercial to administrative
Ratio Decidendi
Umujyi wa Kigali is allowed to intervene voluntarily because it was not a party in lower courts and has a direct legal interest; such intervention does not alter the commercial nature of the dispute, which is based on contractual obligations between CAPLAKI and Mukanyirinkwaya.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection dismissed; voluntary intervention allowed; main hearing to continue
Orders
- Voluntary intervention by Umujyi wa Kigali permitted.
- Main hearing scheduled for 12 July 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment