Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko CRBC Ltd itubahirije amasezerano yo gusuka itaka, rugenera DE HAGUENAU indishyi z’inyongera, rubihakana ku bindi byasabwe.
The Supreme Court held that signed delivery or work sheets can prove a contract even without a formal written agreement, and dismissed PMS Ltd’s review claim.
Urukiko rw'Ubujurire rwemeje ko CLAY'S FACTORY Ltd igomba gusubiza 132,750 USD, ruvanaho inyungu za 43,879.95 USD, kandi rwerekana ko ubujurire bwuririye ku bundi ku nyungu butakirwa.
There is no contradiction between the judgments because the parties and subject matter are not identical, and the judgments can be executed concurrently. The applicants' claim lacks merit, and they are liable for costs to the respondents for unnecessary litigation.
Source excerpt
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwatesheje agaciro umusoro kuri 41.971.000 Frw, rwemeza ko wari washatsewa umusoro mbere; rwemeza ariko ko 450.114.953 Frw na 996.101.280 Frw bigomba gusoreshwa.
The Supreme Court held that ACOADI Ltd’s application was barred by res judicata, because the same parties had already litigated the same debt claim.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against refusal to admit intervention, holding that intervention is unavailable unless the underlying case was decided on the merits and is no longer appealable.
The Supreme Court held that RNECO Ltd proved no compensable loss from NAEB’s failure to sign a new cooperation agreement, so claimed damages were denied.
The Supreme Court held that, even if the value of the property was not previously litigated, the ascertainable value of the auctioned property (shares) must be used to determine the court's jurisdiction for a second appeal. Since the value exceeded 50,000,000 Frw, the High Court, Nyanza Chamber, had jurisdiction to hear the second appeal by Daba Suppliers Ltd.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held that UBUZIMA Polyclinic Ltd’s second appeal was inadmissible because it had lost in both lower courts on the same grounds.
Explore more
