LAKESIDE v IDAMANGE

LAKESIDE v IDAMANGE

The applicants failed to provide concrete evidence of bias or any of the statutory grounds for recusal under Article 103 of Law No. 22/2018; mere dissatisfaction with the judge's conduct or prior involvement in a related case does not suffice for recusal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/RECUS/RCOM 00001/2025/CA
Parties
Applicant: LAKESIDE Ltd; Applicant: Idamange Faith Shaw; Respondent: Ngagi M. Alphonse
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 August 2025
Case Number
RS/RECUS/RCOM 00001/2025/CA
Procedural Posture
Recusal Application / Appellate Decision
Outcome
recusal application dismissed
Legal Topics
Recusal of Judge, Judicial Bias, Fair Trial
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Recusal of Judge Judicial Bias Fair Trial

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LAKESIDE Ltd

Applicant

Idamange Faith Shaw

Applicant

Ngagi M. Alphonse

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Recusal Application / Appellate Decision

  1. 1 Whether the recusal application against Judge Ngagi M. Alphonse has legal basis under Rwandan law

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants failed to provide concrete evidence of bias or any of the statutory grounds for recusal under Article 103 of Law No. 22/2018; mere dissatisfaction with the judge's conduct or prior involvement in a related case does not suffice for recusal.

Court Disposition

recusal application dismissed

Orders

  • The recusal application by LAKESIDE Ltd and Idamange Faith Shaw is dismissed for lack of merit.
  • Judge Ngagi M. Alphonse shall continue to preside over case Nº RCOM 00003/2025/CA.