UBUSHINJACYAHA vs MPONGEMPITE

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs MPONGEMPITE

There is no contradiction between two judgments from the Gacaca Appeals Court of Nyabitare on 17/08/2009 because only one final judgment exists for that date, sentencing Mpongempite Emmanuel to 30 years. The 15-year sentence was from a different court and date. Therefore, the claim of contradictory judgments is unfounded.

Citation
RP 00001/2024/SC
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Mpongempite Emmanuel
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
30 September 2025
Case Number
RP 00001/2024/SC
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Double Jeopardy, Finality of Judgments, Jurisdiction of Gacaca Courts, Contradictory Judgments
Source Language
rw

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Mpongempite Emmanuel

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Supreme Court Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether there is a contradiction between two judgments issued by the Gacaca Appeals Court of Nyabitare on 17/08/2009 against Mpongempite Emmanuel

Ratio Decidendi

There is no contradiction between two judgments from the Gacaca Appeals Court of Nyabitare on 17/08/2009 because only one final judgment exists for that date, sentencing Mpongempite Emmanuel to 30 years. The 15-year sentence was from a different court and date. Therefore, the claim of contradictory judgments is unfounded.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • The claim by Mpongempite Emmanuel alleging contradictory judgments is dismissed as unfounded.
  • It is declared that there are not two contradictory judgments issued by the Gacaca Appeals Court of Nyabitare on 17/08/2009.