MUKAGATARE N’ABANDI v SANLAM AG Plc

MUKAGATARE N’ABANDI v SANLAM AG Plc

The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence of actual and regular dependency on the deceased as required by Article 22 of Presidential Order Nº 31/01 of 25/08/2003 and Supreme Court precedent. The certificate from the Sector Executive Secretary was not corroborated by other evidence, and the applicant, being...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/INJUST/RC 00021/2022/SC
Parties
Applicant: Mukagatare Régine n’abandi; Respondent: SANLAM AG Plc
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
17 March 2023
Case Number
RS/INJUST/RC 00021/2022/SC
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (review on Grounds of Injustice) / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; no economic damages awarded to applicant.
Legal Topics
Compensation for Road Accident, Economic Damages, Burden of Proof, Review for Injustice, Insurance Liability
Source Language
rw
Civil Law Insurance Law Tort Law Compensation for Road Accident Economic Damages Burden of Proof Review for Injustice Insurance Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mukagatare Régine n’abandi

Applicant

SANLAM AG Plc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (review on Grounds of Injustice) / Supreme Court Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Mukagatare Régine is entitled to economic damages (indishyi z'ibangamirabukungu) following the death of Habyarimana Pacifique in a road accident
  2. 2 Whether the documentary evidence provided suffices to prove dependency for economic damages
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to legal costs and attorney fees

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence of actual and regular dependency on the deceased as required by Article 22 of Presidential Order Nº 31/01 of 25/08/2003 and Supreme Court precedent. The certificate from the Sector Executive Secretary was not corroborated by other evidence, and the applicant, being 61 years old and not proven incapacitated, was presumed able to support herself. Therefore, she is not entitled to economic damages.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; no economic damages awarded to applicant.

Orders

  • Applicant's claim for review on grounds of injustice is dismissed.
  • Applicant is denied economic damages (indishyi z'ibangamirabukungu).