MULINDAHABI v. ENERGY, WATER AND SANITATION AUTORITY (EWSA) Ltd

MULINDAHABI v. ENERGY, WATER AND SANITATION AUTORITY (EWSA) Ltd

Applicant's evidence was not new, procedural claims lacked merit, and no fraud or gross error occurred; thus, review was not warranted under Article 186 of Law No.21/2012.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.3-2017
Parties
Applicant: Mulindahabi Fidèle; Respondent: ENERGY, WATER AND SANITATION AUTHORITY (EWSA) Ltd; Respondent: REG; Respondent: WASAC
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
8 November 2013
Case Number
RADA0015/13/CS
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Application for Review Based on New Grounds
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Review of Judgments, Employment Termination, Statutory Interpretation, Procedural Irregularity
Administrative Law Employment Law Review of Judgments Employment Termination Statutory Interpretation Procedural Irregularity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mulindahabi Fidèle

Applicant

ENERGY, WATER AND SANITATION AUTHORITY (EWSA) Ltd

Respondent

REG

Respondent

WASAC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Administrative Review / Application for Review Based on New Grounds

  1. 1 Whether new evidence exists to justify review of Supreme Court judgment RADA0015/13/CS
  2. 2 Whether procedural irregularities or fraud occurred in the original proceedings
  3. 3 Whether applicant was governed by statutory employment or contractual employment regime

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant's evidence was not new, procedural claims lacked merit, and no fraud or gross error occurred; thus, review was not warranted under Article 186 of Law No.21/2012.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Applicant's request for review is rejected.
  • Applicant ordered to pay court fees of 100,000 Frw.