Re MURANGWA (SPEC-ADD)

Re MURANGWA (SPEC-ADD)

The Supreme Court held that Murangwa Edward has standing to challenge the constitutionality of the impugned statutory provisions because the laws in question apply to all persons in Rwanda, including the applicant, and may affect his fundamental rights. The Court reaffirmed that standing in constitutional litigation...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.3-2024
Parties
Applicant: Murangwa Edward; Respondent: Leta y’u Rwanda (Government of Rwanda)
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
16 December 2022
Case Number
RS/INCONST/SPEC 00001/2022/SC
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Ruling on Standing
Outcome
Applicant has standing; proceedings to continue.
Legal Topics
Standing to Challenge Legislation, Constitutionality of Statutes, Rights of Accused Persons, Search and Seizure, Media and Privacy, Public Interest Litigation
Source Language
rw
Constitutional Law Criminal Procedure Standing to Challenge Legislation Constitutionality of Statutes Rights of Accused Persons Search and Seizure Media and Privacy Public Interest Litigation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Murangwa Edward

Applicant

Leta y’u Rwanda (Government of Rwanda)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Ruling on Standing

  1. 1 Whether Murangwa Edward has standing to challenge the constitutionality of certain statutory provisions before the Supreme Court of Rwanda.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that Murangwa Edward has standing to challenge the constitutionality of the impugned statutory provisions because the laws in question apply to all persons in Rwanda, including the applicant, and may affect his fundamental rights. The Court reaffirmed that standing in constitutional litigation is interpreted broadly, and it is sufficient if the applicant is among those affected by the law, without the need to show actual harm. The Court also recognized standing for public interest litigation and for advocates acting in the interest of justice.

Court Disposition

Applicant has standing; proceedings to continue.

Orders

  • The Court declares that Murangwa Edward has standing to challenge the constitutionality of the impugned statutory provisions.
  • The hearing of the main petition shall proceed on a date to be notified by the Court Registry.