Re MURANGWA (SPEC-ADD)
The Supreme Court held that Murangwa Edward has standing to challenge the constitutionality of the impugned statutory provisions because the laws in question apply to all persons in Rwanda, including the applicant, and may affect his fundamental rights. The Court reaffirmed that standing in constitutional litigation is interpreted broadly, and it is sufficient if the applicant is among those affected by the law, without the need to show actual harm. The Court also recognized standing for public interest litigation and for advocates acting in the interest of justice.
Source excerpt
- Standing to challenge legislation
- Constitutionality of statutes
- Rights of accused persons
- Search and seizure
- Media and privacy
- Public interest litigation