NDAYAMBAJE v. GATETE

NDAYAMBAJE v. GATETE

The contract between the parties covered both trucks and was not terminated by the sale of one truck, as this was done by mutual agreement. The appellant remains liable for the principal and agreed interest, less amounts already paid. Damages not claimed at first instance cannot be awarded on appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMA 0043/09/CS
Parties
Appellant: Ndayambaje J. Damascène; Respondent: Gatete Gaspard
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
3 June 2011
Case Number
RCOMA 0043/09/CS
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal partially allowed
Legal Topics
Sale of Goods, Loan Agreements, Interest Calculation, Damages, Appeal Procedure
Commercial Law Contract Law Sale of Goods Loan Agreements Interest Calculation Damages Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ndayambaje J. Damascène

Appellant

Gatete Gaspard

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sale contract for two trucks was terminated by the sale of one truck by the respondent
  2. 2 Determination of principal debt and interest owed by appellant
  3. 3 Entitlement to damages not claimed at first instance

Ratio Decidendi

The contract between the parties covered both trucks and was not terminated by the sale of one truck, as this was done by mutual agreement. The appellant remains liable for the principal and agreed interest, less amounts already paid. Damages not claimed at first instance cannot be awarded on appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal partially allowed

Orders

  • Appellant to pay respondent 55,831,871 Frw as principal and interest
  • Appellant to pay 1,000,000 Frw as enforcement costs