NDEREYEHE v. NYIRAMAHINGURA N’ABANDI

NDEREYEHE v. NYIRAMAHINGURA N’ABANDI

Nyiramahingura Gratia's intervention did not demonstrate a distinct interest from Musengimana Philomène, who had already litigated the property dispute. Therefore, the intervention petition should not have been accepted, and the subsequent judgment based on that intervention is annulled.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.3-2020
Parties
Applicant: Ndereyehe François; Respondent: Nyiramahingura Gratia; Respondent: Musengimana Philomène
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
9 March 2018
Case Number
RS/INJUST/RC 00020/2017
Procedural Posture
Civil / Supreme Court Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Intervention in Proceedings, Family Property Rights, Standing to Oppose Judgment
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Family Law Intervention in Proceedings Family Property Rights Standing to Oppose Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ndereyehe François

Applicant

Nyiramahingura Gratia

Respondent

Musengimana Philomène

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Supreme Court Appeal

  1. 1 Whether Nyiramahingura Gratia was entitled to intervene in RCA0195/12/TGI/GIC
  2. 2 Whether the intervention petition demonstrated a distinct interest from previous parties

Ratio Decidendi

Nyiramahingura Gratia's intervention did not demonstrate a distinct interest from Musengimana Philomène, who had already litigated the property dispute. Therefore, the intervention petition should not have been accepted, and the subsequent judgment based on that intervention is annulled.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgment RCA0296/12/TGI/GIC is annulled.
  • Judgment RCA0195/12/TGI/GIC stands and must be executed.