NYIRANSABIMANA v UWINEZA N’ABANDI

NYIRANSABIMANA v UWINEZA N’ABANDI

No appeal or tierce opposition is permitted against judgments revised for injustice, regardless of whether the applicant was a party to the original proceedings; the High Court correctly refused to entertain the tierce opposition.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RSA/RS/REV/RC 00001/2024/CA
Parties
Applicant: Nyiransabimana Jacqueline; Respondent: Uwineza Jacqueline; Interested Party: Nsanzumuhire Boniface; Interested Party: Mukabadege Epiphanie; Interested Party: Ntezirizaza Théogène
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
23 May 2025
Case Number
RSA/RS/REV/RC 00001/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Revision for Injustice, Tierce Opposition, Jurisdiction, Distribution of Property, Child Support
Source Language
rw
Family Law Civil Procedure Revision for Injustice Tierce Opposition Jurisdiction Distribution of Property Child Support

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nyiransabimana Jacqueline

Applicant

Uwineza Jacqueline

Respondent

Nsanzumuhire Boniface

Interested Party

Mukabadege Epiphanie

Interested Party

Ntezirizaza Théogène

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether tierce opposition is permissible against a judgment revised for injustice
  2. 2 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to entertain tierce opposition against a revised judgment
  3. 3 Entitlement to monetary claims by parties

Ratio Decidendi

No appeal or tierce opposition is permitted against judgments revised for injustice, regardless of whether the applicant was a party to the original proceedings; the High Court correctly refused to entertain the tierce opposition.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • High Court judgment affirmed
  • Applicant to pay respondent RWF 200,000 for litigation costs and RWF 500,000 for attorney fees