PROSECUTION v. HAKIZIMANA_144391_en
The Supreme Court held that judgments rendered upon review, whether in civil or criminal matters, are final and not subject to appeal, as established by statutory law and prior case law. Therefore, the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from such a judgment, and its decision must be quashed.
- Citation
- RLR V.2-2016
- Parties
- Appellant: Prosecution; Respondent: Hakizimana Augustin
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2013
- Case Number
- RPA0002/GEN/13/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court judgment quashed for lack of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Jurisdiction, Review of Judgments, Finality of Judgments
- Source Language
- en, rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prosecution
Appellant
Hakizimana Augustin
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal lies against a judgment rendered upon review in criminal cases
- 2 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a judgment rendered upon review by the Intermediate Court
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that judgments rendered upon review, whether in civil or criminal matters, are final and not subject to appeal, as established by statutory law and prior case law. Therefore, the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from such a judgment, and its decision must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment quashed for lack of jurisdiction.
Orders
- The judgment RPA/GEN/0001/12/HC/KIG is invalidated.
- Court fees to be paid by the government.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment