RRA v GIKONKO RICE

RRA v GIKONKO RICE

Rice that is hulled and cleaned, even by machine, without chemical transformation or mixing, does not become a new type of food for VAT purposes. Therefore, the VAT assessment against GIKONKO RICE Ltd was unlawful and must be set aside.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMA 00815/2018/HCC
Parties
Appellant: Rwanda Revenue Authority; Respondent: GIKONKO RICE Ltd
Court
Commercial High Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
12 July 2019
Case Number
RCOMA 00815/2018/HCC
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Value Added Tax, Definition of Processed Foods, Tax Exemptions, Assessment Notices
Tax Law Commercial Law Value Added Tax Definition of Processed Foods Tax Exemptions Assessment Notices

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rwanda Revenue Authority

Appellant

GIKONKO RICE Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the rice sold by GIKONKO RICE Ltd qualifies as a new type of food subject to VAT under Rwandan law
  2. 2 Whether the VAT assessment imposed by RRA should be upheld or set aside
  3. 3 Whether either party is entitled to damages or attorney fees

Ratio Decidendi

Rice that is hulled and cleaned, even by machine, without chemical transformation or mixing, does not become a new type of food for VAT purposes. Therefore, the VAT assessment against GIKONKO RICE Ltd was unlawful and must be set aside.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • RRA to pay GIKONKO RICE Ltd 500,000 RWF as attorney fees
  • Decision of Commercial Court in RCOM 02093/2018/TC affirmed