SIKUBWABO v RWANDA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (RDB) N’ABANDI (ADD 2)

SIKUBWABO v RWANDA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (RDB) N’ABANDI (ADD 2)

The applicant's request to join the Supreme Court case with the pending Court of Appeal case was inadmissible because it was not submitted through the correct procedural channel (it should have been submitted to the lower court, not directly to the Supreme Court). Furthermore, cases under review for injustice cannot be joined with cases still subject to ordinary appeal due to their different procedural nature and stages.

Citation
RLR V.3-2023
Parties
Applicant: Sikubwabo Raphaël; Respondent: Rwanda Development Board (RDB); Interested Party: Bank of Africa; Interested Party: Murego Paulin; Interested Party: Umugiraneza Jean Michel
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
15 July 2022
Case Number
RS/INJUST/RCOM 00007/2021/SC
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Supreme Court Application for Joinder of Cases and Review for Injustice
Outcome
Application for joinder dismissed as inadmissible; proceedings in the main case to continue.
Legal Topics
Joinder of Cases, Powers of Courts, Auction of Mortgaged Property, Review for Injustice, Limitation Periods
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Joinder of Cases Powers of Courts Auction of Mortgaged Property Review for Injustice Limitation Periods

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sikubwabo Raphaël

Applicant

Rwanda Development Board (RDB)

Respondent

Bank of Africa

Interested Party

Murego Paulin

Interested Party

Umugiraneza Jean Michel

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Supreme Court Application for Joinder of Cases and Review for Injustice

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's request to join the Supreme Court case with a pending Court of Appeal case was admissible
  2. 2 Whether cases at different procedural stages and through different procedural avenues (ordinary appeal vs. review for injustice) can be joined

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's request to join the Supreme Court case with the pending Court of Appeal case was inadmissible because it was not submitted through the correct procedural channel (it should have been submitted to the lower court, not directly to the Supreme Court). Furthermore, cases under review for injustice cannot be joined with cases still subject to ordinary appeal due to their different procedural nature and stages.

Court Disposition

Application for joinder dismissed as inadmissible; proceedings in the main case to continue.

Orders

  • The request by Sikubwabo Raphaël to join the Supreme Court case with the Court of Appeal case is dismissed as inadmissible.
  • The hearing of the main case will continue on a date to be notified by the court registry.