UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MWEREKANDE

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MWEREKANDE

The appellant failed to demonstrate any error or improper exercise of discretion by the High Court in imposing the sentence; therefore, no further reduction is warranted and the appeal lacks merit.

Citation
RPAA 00734/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Mwerekande David
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 March 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00734/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Appeals
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Mwerekande David

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should receive a further reduction in sentence based on mitigating circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to demonstrate any error or improper exercise of discretion by the High Court in imposing the sentence; therefore, no further reduction is warranted and the appeal lacks merit.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Mwerekande David is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment of the High Court, RPA 01466/2021/HC/RWG of 28/6/2024, is upheld.