Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko igihano cya Mukandanyuzwe Jamila ari cyo gito gishoboka kandi ko ubujurire bwe nta shingiro bufite.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko ubujurire bwa Mbyariyehe na Nagaba nta shingiro bufite, rusigaho igifungo cy’imyaka 15 n’ihazabu ya 5.000.000Frw kuri buri wese.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko igihano cya 15 ans n’ihazabu ya 5.000.000 Frw byahawe Nzayisenga Emmanuel ari byo byari bike bishoboka, bityo ubujurire bwe ntibwagira ishingiro.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko igihano cy’imyaka 15 cyari gito gishoboka ku cyaha cyo gusambanya umwana uri munsi y’imyaka 14, bityo ubujurire ntibugira shingiro.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwavuze ko igifungo cy’imyaka 15 cyari cyamaze kugera ku rwego rwo hasi giteganywa n’amategeko ku cyaha cyahamijwe, bityo nta kongera kugabanyirizwa.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwahamije ko igihano cyo gufungwa imyaka 15 n’ihazabu ya 5.000.000 Frw ari ntarengwa ku byaha byahamijwe, rwanga kugabanya igihano kurushaho.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko igihano cy’imyaka 15 cyari gito gishoboka ku cyaha cyo gusambanya umwana uri munsi y’imyaka 14, bityo ubujurire nta shingiro bufite.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko igihano cy’imyaka 15 cyari gito gishoboka ku cyaha cyo gusambanya umwana uri munsi y’imyaka 14, bityo ubujurire ntibufite shingiro.
The Supreme Court found that Muhire Jean Claude knowingly prepared and signed false valuation reports, Rukundo Rwigemera Prosper facilitated and participated in the forgery and solicited/received a bribe, and Uwizeyimana Marcelline gave a bribe to obtain a loan. The evidence, including witness testimony and documentary proof, established all elements of the offenses. The court applied the more lenient sentencing provisions and ordered all three to jointly compensate GT Bank for losses.
Source excerpt
The conviction was upheld based on the defendant's confession, corroborating witness testimony, and documentary evidence. The sentence reduction previously granted was deemed sufficient given the circumstances and gravity of the offence. The appeal lacked merit and the prior judgment was affirmed.
Source excerpt
Explore more
