UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UMUTONIWASE

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UMUTONIWASE

The appeal was filed 39 days after the judgment was uploaded to IECMS, exceeding the 30-day statutory period. The appellant failed to prove notification occurred later or that any impediment justified the delay. The appeal is inadmissible as untimely.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA00786/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Umutoniwase Diane
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 March 2025
Case Number
RPAA00786/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lateness.
Legal Topics
Appeal Deadlines, Sexual Offences Against Minors, Procedural Default
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Appeal Deadlines Sexual Offences Against Minors Procedural Default

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Umutoniwase Diane

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appeal by Umutoniwase Diane was filed within the statutory time limit and is admissible

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was filed 39 days after the judgment was uploaded to IECMS, exceeding the 30-day statutory period. The appellant failed to prove notification occurred later or that any impediment justified the delay. The appeal is inadmissible as untimely.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lateness.

Orders

  • The appeal by Umutoniwase Diane is not admitted.
  • The High Court judgment (RPA 01136/2021/HC/RWG) of 27/06/2024 remains in force in all its terms.