Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law RS/INJUST/RP 00002/2024/SC

UBUSHINJACYAHA v RUTAGANDA

The Supreme Court held that a fugitive tried and convicted in absentia may not appeal until surrender or arrest renders the prior judgment non-existent.

  • Trial in absentia
  • Right of appeal
  • Forgery and use of forged documents
  • Review for injustice
  • Procedural default
  • Trial-in-absentia
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RCOMAA 00075/2024/CA

ECOBANK RWANDA PLC v. ABAZUNGURA BA RWIGEMA N’UNDI

The Court of Appeal held that a dispute over registering collateral property turned on ownership, not a commercial claim, and upheld dismissal of ECobank's appeal.

  • Jurisdiction of commercial courts
  • Registration of property
  • Mortgage enforcement
  • Standing of heirs
  • Procedural default
  • Commercial-court-jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00347/2025/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NTIRANDEKURA

The appellant failed to submit grounds of appeal within the statutory period despite having access to the judgment; Covid-19 did not constitute a valid excuse as he was able to file the notice of appeal on time. Therefore, the appeal was inadmissible and the original conviction and sentence stand.

  • Appeal timelines
  • Sexual offences against minors
  • Procedural default
  • Covid-19 as excuse
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA00786/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UMUTONIWASE

The appeal was filed 39 days after the judgment was uploaded to IECMS, exceeding the 30-day statutory period. The appellant failed to prove notification occurred later or that any impediment justified the delay. The appeal is inadmissible as untimely.

  • Appeal deadlines
  • Sexual offences against minors
  • Procedural default
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00433/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v UWIMANA

The appeal was not admitted because it was filed after the statutory 30-day period from the date of judgment delivery, and the appellant failed to provide evidence that the delay was caused by circumstances beyond his control attributable to the prison administration.

  • Appeal deadlines
  • Murder
  • Rape
  • Procedural default
Read case analysis
Labour law RS/INJUST/RSOC 00013/2022/CA

AKIMANIZANYE N’ABANDI vs. NICE EGGS COMPANY Ltd N’UNDI [

Only the widow and children of the deceased, who properly exhausted appeal procedures, have standing to seek extraordinary review and are entitled to compensation. Compensation for workplace accident is determined by the court's discretion in absence of specific law, based on general principles and comparable case law, with the employer liable for the total amount minus the portion covered by the insurer under the insurance contract.

  • Workplace accident compensation
  • Standing to sue for compensation
  • Scope of insurance liability
  • Extraordinary review (revision)
  • Calculation of damages
  • Procedural default
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RCOMAA 00014/2019/CA (

KARIGIRWA v. MUZIMA N’ABANDI

The Court of Appeal struck out Karigirwa Félicité’s withdrawal-of-counsel claim for failing to appear represented, treating it as no longer pursued.

  • Representation by counsel
  • Dismissal for want of prosecution
  • Procedural default
  • Representation-by-counsel
  • Dismissal-for-want-of-prosecution
  • Commercial-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 0004/11/CS

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MUTEMBEREZI

The Supreme Court struck out Mutemberezi Silas’s criminal appeal for non-appearance and failure to pursue the appeal after proper legal summons.

  • Appeals
  • Absence of appellant
  • Procedural default
  • Child sexual abuse
  • Criminal-appeals
  • Procedural-default
Read case analysis
Criminal law RLR V.1-2016

UBUSHINJACYAHA V. NSANGIRANABO

The Supreme Court held that Nsangiranabo Raphaël’s criminal appeal was timely because prison delays and missing notice could not be used against him.

  • Appeal period
  • Procedural default
  • Prisoner rights
  • Criminal-appeals
  • Appeal-period
  • Prisoner-rights
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RCOMA 0065/09/CS

KOBIL PETROLEUM v. CITIEX

The Supreme Court dismissed KOBIL PETROLEUM’s application to revive a dismissed commercial appeal, holding there was no good cause under Article 51.

  • Revival of dismissed case
  • Procedural default
  • Burden of showing good cause
  • Revival-of-dismissed-case
  • Procedural-default
  • Good-cause
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.