UWANYIRIGIRA v BRITAM

UWANYIRIGIRA v BRITAM

BRITAM is not liable for compensation arising from an accident caused by the insured vehicle's driver intentionally overloading the vehicle beyond its insured capacity, as such conduct constitutes a deliberate breach of insurance obligations and is excluded from coverage under the law and contract.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCA 00045/2022/HC/KIG
Parties
Appellant: Uwanyirigira Donatha; Respondent: BRITAM Insurance Company Rwanda Ltd
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
30 June 2023
Case Number
RCA 00045/2022/HC/KIG
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / High Court Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Insurance Liability, Tort Liability, Contractual Obligations, Overloading of Vehicles, Direct Action Against Insurer
Source Language
rw
Insurance Law Tort Law Civil Procedure Insurance Liability Tort Liability Contractual Obligations Overloading of Vehicles Direct Action Against Insurer

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Uwanyirigira Donatha

Appellant

BRITAM Insurance Company Rwanda Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / High Court Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether BRITAM Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation for injuries resulting from an accident caused by overloading beyond the insured capacity
  2. 2 Whether the compensation claimed by the appellant should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

BRITAM is not liable for compensation arising from an accident caused by the insured vehicle's driver intentionally overloading the vehicle beyond its insured capacity, as such conduct constitutes a deliberate breach of insurance obligations and is excluded from coverage under the law and contract.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Uwanyirigira Donatha is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment of the Nyarugenge Intermediate Court in RC 00955/2020/TGI/NYGE is upheld.