UBUSHINJACYAHA vs RUTIKANGA
The appeal was dismissed because the court found no material defects in the evidence relied upon by the lower courts. The hearsay evidence was corroborated by the medical report, which showed signs consistent with sexual assault. The absence of semen did not undermine the conviction, as the totality of evidence, including the child's testimony and supporting witnesses, was sufficient. The appellant failed to rebut the medical findings or provide a plausible alternative explanation. The conviction and sentence were upheld.
Source excerpt
- Sexual offences against children
- Admissibility of hearsay evidence
- Medical evidence in criminal trials
- Standard of proof in criminal cases