NISHIMWE ET AL v. MUGENGA
The Supreme Court held that a buyer who improved immovable property later returned to the true owners is entitled to reimbursement for necessary and useful works, but not beautification works.
- Sale of immovable property
- Restitution for value added
- Unjust enrichment
- Good faith/bad faith purchase
- Compensation for necessary and useful works
- Removal of unauthorized constructions