Esheria Rwanda Case Law
Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter Rwanda case law

Results update automatically as you type.

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law RLR V.1-2017

LETA Y’U RWANDA (MINECOFIN) v. VUZIMPUNDU

Court
Supreme Court
Case number
RADA0037/13/CS

The Supreme Court held that Vuzimpundu’s dismissal was unlawful because it was issued by an official without proper authority, but her refusal to swear on the flag was a lawful ground for dismissal.

  • Dismissal of public employees
  • Delegation of authority
  • Freedom of religion and conscience
  • Procedural requirements for administrative claims
  • Employee oath requirements
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2017] 1 RLR

GOVERNMENT OF RWANDA (MINECOFIN) v. VUZIMPUNDU

Court
Supreme Court
Case number
RADA0037/13/CS

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of Vuzimpundu’s appeal in part, finding the administrative claim admissible but confirming the dismissal for refusal to take the required oath.

  • Dismissal of public servant
  • Competence of dismissing authority
  • Religious freedom and oath-taking
  • Administrative procedure
  • Delegation of authority
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Labour law R SOC A 0135/14/HC/KIG

BAKHRESA GRAIN MILLING RWANDA LTD v. RUTIKANGA - Englsh version

Court
High Court
Case number
R SOC A 0135/14/HC/KIG

The High Court held that a delegated HR manager could dismiss the employee, but the employer failed to prove the dismissal ground stated in litigation.

  • Unlawful dismissal
  • Delegation of authority
  • Admissibility of new evidence on appeal
  • Damages for unfair dismissal
  • Unlawful-dismissal
  • Delegation-of-authority
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.