NYIRINKINDI v. EDCL N’UNDI
The applicant failed to provide credible, non-speculative evidence that the electricity pylons or transmission line caused compensable harm or prevented the use of his land for its designated agricultural purpose. The applicant's claims for compensation and removal of pylons are unsupported by admissible evidence. New claims regarding relocation cannot be entertained in a review for injustice as they were not raised in prior proceedings.
Source excerpt
- Burden of proof
- Compensation for expropriation
- Electricity infrastructure
- Judicial review
- Res judicata