Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
International criminal law ICTR-2001-70-T

THE PROSECUTOR v. Emmanuel RUKUNDO

The Chamber found that Emmanuel Rukundo, acting as a priest and military chaplain, committed genocide by participating in the killing of Madame Rudahunga and causing serious bodily harm to her children and two other Tutsi civilians, and by participating in the abduction and killing of Tutsi refugees from the St. Léon Minor Seminary. The Chamber also found, by majority, that Rukundo committed genocide by sexually assaulting a young Tutsi woman, causing her serious mental harm. The Chamber found Rukundo guilty of murder as a crime against humanity for the killing of Madame Rudahunga, and guilty…

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Murder
  • Extermination
  • Sexual violence
  • Individual criminal responsibility
Read case analysis
International criminal law ICTR-99-54A-A

JEAN DE DIEU KAMUHANDA v. THE PROSECUTOR (APPEAL JUDGMENT)

The Appeals Chamber found that the appellant was properly convicted for ordering genocide and extermination as crimes against humanity based on credible evidence of his presence, authority, and actions at the Gikomero Parish Compound on 12 April 1994, including giving the order to attack. The convictions for instigating and aiding and abetting were vacated due to insufficient nexus between the distribution of weapons and the massacre. The appellant's arguments regarding defects in the indictment, assessment of evidence, burden of proof, and sentencing were rejected. The sentence of life impri…

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Extermination
  • Individual criminal responsibility
  • Aiding and abetting
  • Ordering
Read case analysis
International criminal law ICTR-02-78-A

THE PROSECUTOR v. GASPARD KANYARUKIGA (TRIAL JUDGMENT)

The Chamber found that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Gaspard Kanyarukiga planned the destruction of Nyange Church on 16 April 1994, which resulted in the killing of approximately 2000 Tutsi civilians, and that he acted with the specific intent to destroy the Tutsi ethnic group in whole or in part. The Chamber rejected the accused's alibi as not reasonably possibly true, found insufficient evidence of his direct participation during the demolition, and acquitted him of complicity in genocide. The Chamber held that planning the destruction of the church substantially contr…

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Extermination
  • Joint criminal enterprise
  • Individual criminal responsibility
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
International criminal law ICTR-2000-61-T

THE PROSECUTOR v. JEAN-BAPTISTE GATETE (TRIAL JUDGMENT)

Gatete is individually criminally responsible for genocide and extermination as a crime against humanity, based on his planning, instigating, ordering, committing through joint criminal enterprise, and aiding and abetting the killing of Tutsis in Rwankuba sector, Kiziguro parish, and Mukarange parish in April 1994. The evidence established beyond reasonable doubt that Gatete coordinated with local officials and militia, provided material support, issued explicit orders to kill, and shared the genocidal intent. The Chamber found the scale, organization, and context of the attacks demonstrated…

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Extermination
  • Murder
  • Rape
  • Conspiracy to commit genocide
Read case analysis
International criminal law

The Prosecutor v. Yussuf Munyakazi

The Trial Chamber convicted Yussuf Munyakazi of genocide and extermination as a crime against humanity for his role in the 29 and 30 April 1994 attacks.

  • Genocide
  • Extermination as a crime against humanity
  • Individual criminal responsibility
  • Joint criminal enterprise
  • Sentencing
  • Extermination
Read case analysis
International criminal law ICTR-05-86-S

The Prosecutor v. Michel Bagaragaza

Michel Bagaragaza is individually criminally responsible for complicity in genocide under Article 2(3)(e) and Article 6(1) of the ICTR Statute, having provided substantial assistance to the killings of more than one thousand Tutsi with knowledge of the genocidal intent of the principal perpetrators. Extraordinary mitigating circumstances, including early and ongoing cooperation with the Prosecution, voluntary surrender, guilty plea, and genuine remorse, warrant a substantial reduction in sentence.

  • Genocide
  • Complicity in genocide
  • Sentencing
  • Guilty plea
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Aggravating circumstances
Read case analysis
International criminal law 27 February 2009

The Prosecutor v. Emmanuel Rukundo (Trial Judgment)

The Chamber found that Emmanuel Rukundo was individually criminally responsible for genocide, murder, and extermination as crimes against humanity. The Chamber determined that Rukundo, acting as a priest and military chaplain, participated in the abduction and killing of Tutsi civilians, including the murder of Madame Rudahunga and the abduction and killing of Tutsi refugees from the St. Léon Minor Seminary. The Chamber found that Rukundo’s actions were integral to the commission of these crimes and that he acted with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in part, the Tutsi ethnic group…

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Murder
  • Extermination
  • Sexual violence
  • Individual criminal responsibility
Read case analysis
International criminal law ICTR-01-73-T

The Prosecutor v. Protais Zigiranyirazo (Judgment and Sentence)

The Chamber found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the accused's involvement in most alleged meetings, the creation or support of the Interahamwe, or responsibility for the Rurunga Hill massacre, roadblocks in Gisenyi, and individual murders. However, the Chamber found that at Kesho Hill, Zigiranyirazo participated in a joint criminal enterprise to kill Tutsi by addressing and encouraging assailants, and that at the Kiyovu roadblock, he aided and abetted genocide by instructing those manning the roadblock to check identity cards for Tutsi and providing support, kno…

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Extermination
  • Murder
  • Conspiracy
  • Complicity
Read case analysis
International criminal law ICTR-2001-66-I

THE PROSECUTOR V. ATHANASE SEROMBA (TRIAL JUDGEMENT)

ICTR Trial Chamber III convicted Athanase Seromba of genocide and extermination by aiding and abetting, and sentenced him to 15 years.

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Extermination
  • Aiding and abetting
  • Individual criminal responsibility
  • Crimes-against-humanity
Read case analysis
International criminal law ICTR 00-60-T

THE PROSECUTOR v. PAUL BISENGIMANA (JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE)

Trial Chamber II convicted Paul Bisengimana of extermination as a crime against humanity and sentenced him to 15 years’ imprisonment after a guilty plea.

  • Crimes against humanity
  • Extermination
  • Murder
  • Aiding and abetting
  • Individual criminal responsibility
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.