Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law RPAA 00861/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. UWAYEZU

The Court of Appeal held that Uwayezu Emmanuel was not criminally responsible for attempted murder because expert evidence showed schizophrenia affecting his mental capacity.

  • Criminal responsibility
  • Mental illness
  • Insanity defense
  • Attempted murder
  • Criminal-responsibility
  • Mental-illness
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00431/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v KAMATARI

The Court of Appeal held that Kamatari Jean was not criminally responsible because a mental disorder deprived him of the ability to understand or control his acts.

  • Criminal responsibility
  • Insanity defense
  • Sexual offenses
  • Child protection
  • Criminal-responsibility
  • Insanity-defense
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00027/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MURAGIJIMANA

Muragijimana Eric is not criminally responsible for defilement of a minor because credible medical evidence and corroborating investigation established he suffered from a mental illness depriving him of understanding and self-control at the time of the offense, thus the life imprisonment sentence is set aside and he is to be placed under medical care.

  • Criminal responsibility
  • Insanity defense
  • Sexual offenses against minors
  • Procedural fairness
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPA 0193/12/CS

PROSECUTOR v. MBONIMPAYE

The Supreme Court rejected an insanity defense for lack of proof, upheld the murder conviction, and increased the civil party’s damages on appeal.

  • Murder
  • Insanity defense
  • Burden of proof
  • Moral damages
  • Procedural fees
  • Insanity-defense
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPA 0062/ 10CS

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MUNYAMBIBI

The Supreme Court found that Munyambibi Gilbert was suffering from a mental illness at the time of the offense, as confirmed by medical evidence and the circumstances of the crime, and therefore was not criminally responsible under Article 70 of the Penal Code.

  • Insanity defense
  • Criminal responsibility
  • Murder
  • Mental health and criminal law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.