Re. BYANSI (ADD)
The Court held that Byansi Samuel Baker had sufficient interest to bring the constitutional challenge, as the impugned provision directly affected his rights as a journalist and the outcome would have a tangible impact on his legal position. The temporary lapse in his press card did not negate his standing, given his ongoing professional activity and the subsequent renewal of his credentials.
Source excerpt
- Freedom of the press
- Access to information
- Standing (interest to sue)
- Judicial review of legislation