UBUSHINJACYAHA vs NTAMPAKA
The appellate court held that the testimony of the 10-year-old victim, corroborated by other witnesses and the medical report, was credible and sufficient to uphold the conviction. The court found no procedural or evidentiary errors in the lower courts' assessment and rejected the appellant's claims of bias and insufficiency of evidence.
Source excerpt
- Rape of a minor
- Admissibility of child testimony
- Assessment of medical evidence
- Burden of proof in criminal cases