UBUSHINJACYAHA v. HAKUZIMANA
The appeal lacked merit because the conviction was based on a combination of the child victim’s testimony, corroborating statements from the mother and other witnesses, a medical report, and an apology message from the appellant. The court found no legal or factual basis to overturn the conviction, holding that the evidence was sufficient and properly assessed.
Source excerpt
- Sexual offences
- Evidence assessment
- Child witness testimony
- Appeals procedure