IKIGO CY’IMISORO N’AMAHOORO (RRA) v. MUHIRE
The Supreme Court held that a 10,177,083 Frw advance was a loan, not taxable income, and that Muhire could raise VAT limitation as a defense. RRA’s appeal failed.
- Income tax
- Value added tax
- Statute of limitations
- Deductibility of loans
- Attorney fees
- Income-tax