Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Supreme Court held that only parties who applied for review due to injustice may seek changes, unless indivisibility is shown; incidental applications were inadmissible.
The Supreme Court held that all parties to a judgment challenged for injustice must be summoned, even if not all applied for review through the Ombudsman.
The Supreme Court held that keeping a convicted person in prison until a fine is paid is not authorized by Rwandan law and ordered Uwiringiyimana's immediate release.
The Supreme Court held that the Office of Ombudsman is not required to pay court fees when requesting review of a final decision due to injustice, may act on its own initiative for cases referred before the law came into force, and that execution of the judgment does not bar such a request. The objections raised by Karangwa were dismissed as lacking merit, and the case was set to proceed to hearing on the merits.
Source excerpt
Explore more
