Re FEMINIST ACTION DEVELOPMENT AMBITION (FADA)
The Court held that Article 143 of Law NÂş68/2018 is not contrary to Articles 13, 15, or 16 of the Constitution. The law is neutral in its wording, applies equally to all persons, and does not, on its face, discriminate on the basis of gender. Alleged discriminatory enforcement does not render the law itself unconstitutional. The petitioner failed to demonstrate a causal link between the law and any violation of the right to physical and mental integrity or to prove that the law is vague to the extent of violating constitutional rights.
Source excerpt
- Constitutionality of statutes
- Equality before the law
- Non-discrimination
- Right to physical and mental integrity
- Vagueness of criminal offences
- Gender-based discrimination