MUKANDAYAMBAJE v. MUDEYI N’ABANDI
The first sale agreement between Budeyi Jean Bosco and Rutaneshwa John is valid, as Mukandayambaje Aline was a witness and cannot later claim to have purchased the same property. The second agreement to Mukandayambaje is invalid due to inconsistencies, lack of credible evidence, and improper notarial confirmation. The property and expropriation compensation must revert to the succession of Rutaneshwa John. No damages are awarded as all parties acted in pursuit of their legitimate interests.
Source excerpt
- Sale agreements
- Succession rights
- Burden of proof
- Evidence law
- Mutation of property
- Expropriation compensation