KARANGWA v. COGEAR
The insurance contract between KARANGWA and COGEAR was still valid at the time of the fire due to tacit renewal and absence of proper termination notice; therefore, COGEAR is liable for the insured damages but not for bank interest, as there is no direct contractual link between the insurance and the bank loan.
Source excerpt
- Validity of insurance contract
- Tacit renewal
- Insurer liability
- Damages
- Interest on bank loans