Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Scotland decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Vyncint LTD against Ryanair DAC (Sheriff Court Civil) [2025] SCAYR 100 (16 October 2025)
The sheriff allowed a revised minute of amendment in a payment and counterclaim action, held it did not introduce a new prescribed claim, and reserved expenses.
Priority Construction UK LTD against Advanced Material Processing LTD (Sheriff Court Civil) [2024] SCPER 48 (20 November 2024)
The sheriff held that the construction subcontract price was agreed by volume, not weight, and ordered repayment of sums retained after a disputed winding up petition.
SITEMAN PAINTING AND DECORATING SERVICES LTD, APPEAL BY v SIMPLY CONSTRUCT (UK) LTD [2019] ScotSAC Civ 32 (09 August 2019)
The Sheriff Appeal Court allowed an appeal and held that payment was due under a construction contract for services rendered by Siteman Painting and Decorating Services Ltd.
BN RENDERING LIMITED AGAINST EVERWARM LIMITED [2018] ScotCS CSOH_45 (27 April 2018)
The Court of Session held that an exclusive English jurisdiction clause applied to enforcement of an adjudicator’s award, so the Scottish action was dismissed.
MIDLOTHIAN COUNCIL, RECLAIMING MOTION BY AGAINST BRACEWELL STIRLING ARCHITECTS [2018] ScotCS CSIH_21 (26 March 2018)
The Inner House held that a lead consultant was not contractually liable for other consultants’ acts or omissions under the framework agreement.
AMW PLUMBING AND HEATING LTD v. ZOOM DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED [2010] ScotSC 173 (21 October 2010)
A Scottish Sheriff Court appeal held that a construction contract’s retention mechanism was inadequate, so the statutory Scheme applied and retention became payable.
David Prentice (t/a Duns Slaters) v. Portland Manufacturing [2004] ScotCS 117 (21 May 2004)
The Court of Session refused an appeal in a construction dispute, upholding the sheriff’s findings on contract terms, workmanship, extra work, and a largely dismissed counterclaim.
Maxi Construction Management Ltd v Mortons Rolls Ltd [2001] ScotCS 199 (7 August 2001)
The court held that Interim Valuation No. 10 was not a valid claim for payment and dismissed the pursuers’ action, subject to a By Order hearing.
Strathmore Building Services Ltd v Greig [2000] ScotCS 133 (25 May 2000)
The Court of Session refused a motion to sist a construction payment claim for arbitration, holding that no real dispute arose because withholding-notice requirements were not met.
Boyd & Forrest v. Glasgow and South-Western Railway Co. [1914] ScotLR 281 (07 February 1914)
A railway construction dispute where contractors claimed misrepresentation about bore records and a hidden water-pipe justified rescission, quantum meruit, and damages.
Explore more
