Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Scotland decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Jack Ferguson Baptie against Callum Gillies (Sheriff Court Civil) [2025] SCHAM 79 (03 October 2025)
After proof, the sheriff held that the pursuer was in breach of contract, so he was not entitled to the payment sought. The defender was assoilzied, with expenses reserved.
A against B (Sheriff Court Civil) [2025] SCHAM 47 (09 May 2025)
The sheriff held that the defender dishonestly assisted her husband’s breach of trust and knowingly received misappropriated funds, granting decree for payment.
A AND OTHERS AGAINST GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL [2018] ScotCS CSOH_116 (09 November 2018)
The Court of Session allowed a timebarred personal injury action to proceed under s 19A, finding the balance of equities favoured the pursuers.
BAIN AND PAULINE BAIN AGAINST KARL MARTIN [2018] ScotCS CSOH_83 (09 August 2018)
In a preliminary proof, the Court of Session held the pursuers failed to prove their extension contract was with Karl Martin personally rather than his limited company.
E.A., AGAINST G.N. [2015] ScotCS CSIH_26 (07 April 2015)
Innher House appeal on a time-barred sexual abuse reparation claim under section 19A was refused, and the cross-appeal on liability after age 16 also failed.
The Inter-Vivos Trust of The Late William Strathdee Gordon v Campbell Riddle Breeze Paterson LLP [2015] ScotCS CSOH_31 (25 March 2015)
A solicitor-negligence claim was held time-barred because the pursuers knew they had incurred loss, including legal expenses, by 10 November 2005.
MILLEER v CHIVAS BROTHERS LTD [2014] ScotCS CSIH_65 (11 July 2014)
The Inner House held that the sheriff had erred on expenses after late disclosure of a key witness statement and awarded the appellant expenses for the whole procedure.
Frank Houlgate Investment Company Ltd v Biggart Baillie Llp [2013] ScotCS CSOH_80 (28 May 2013)
The court held that a solicitor who learned of a client’s fraud in an ongoing transaction and failed to withdraw or warn the victim could be liable as an accessory to fraud.
David T Morrison & Co Ltd (t/a Gael Home Interiors) v ICL Plastics Ltd & Anor [2013] ScotCS CSIH_19 (14 March 2013)
The Inner House held that section 11(3) of the 1973 Act may defer prescription until a pursuer knows, or could know with diligence, that loss was caused by fault.
SCOTTISH WATER v. DUNNE BUILDING AND CIVIL ENGINEERING LTD [2012] ScotSC 84 (31 July 2012)
The court allowed Scottish Water’s appeal on the merits, holding that the sheriff applied the wrong test for negligence and granted decree for £12,585.44.
Explore more
