Absa Bank Limited v Keet (817/2013) [2015] ZASCA 81; 2015 (4) SA 474 (SCA); [2015] 4 All SA 1 (SCA) (28 May 2015)

Absa Bank Limited v Keet (817/2013) [2015] ZASCA 81; 2015 (4) SA 474 (SCA); [2015] 4 All SA 1 (SCA) (28 May 2015)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a claim under the actio rei vindicatio is not a debt as contemplated by Chapter III of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969. The distinction between real rights and personal rights is central: real rights, such as ownership, are not subject to the three-year extinctive prescription period applicable to debts. The court found that previous decisions treating vindicatory claims as debts were incorrect, as this interpretation undermines the scheme of the Prescription Act and leads to absurd results. The appeal was upheld, and the special plea of prescription was dismissed.

Citation
[2015] ZASCA 81
Parties
Appellant: Absa Bank Limited; Respondent: André Keet
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 May 2015
Case Number
817/2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Outcome
Appeal upheld; special plea of prescription dismissed.
Judges
Maya, Bosielo, Wallis, Zondi, Meyer
Legal Topics
Prescription Act, Rei Vindicatio, Extinctive Prescription, Real Vs Personal Rights
Civil Procedure Land and Property Prescription Act Rei Vindicatio Extinctive Prescription Real Vs Personal Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 24 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Absa Bank Limited

Appellant

André Keet

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a claim under the actio rei vindicatio prescribes after three years under the Prescription Act 68 of 1969.
  2. 2 Whether a vindicatory claim constitutes a 'debt' for purposes of Chapter III of the Prescription Act.
  3. 3 Whether the previous SCA decisions on prescription of vindicatory claims were correctly decided.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a claim under the actio rei vindicatio is not a debt as contemplated by Chapter III of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969. The distinction between real rights and personal rights is central: real rights, such as ownership, are not subject to the three-year extinctive prescription period applicable to debts. The court found that previous decisions treating vindicatory claims as debts were incorrect, as this interpretation undermines the scheme of the Prescription Act and leads to absurd results. The appeal was upheld, and the special plea of prescription was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; special plea of prescription dismissed.

Orders

  • The appeal succeeds and the order of the high court upholding the special plea of prescription is substituted with: 'The special plea of prescription is dismissed.'
  • No order is made as to costs.