Pienaar and Another v Cowens and Another (11933/2020) [2025] ZAWCHC 334 (5 August 2025)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
11933/2020
Judge
Mapoma
The High Court refused leave to amend a claim to add fraudulent misrepresentation, finding the new cause of action prescribed and prejudicial to the defendants.
Mathebe v Cullinan Diamond Mine (Pty) Ltd (JS382/2023) [2025] ZALCJHB 330 (1 August 2025)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Case number
JS382/2023
Judge
Anestidis
The Labour Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the applicant's claims for general damages and loss of earnings, as such relief is not contemplated by the Labour Relations Act or the Basic Conditions of Employment Act. The applicant failed to refer any unfair labour practice to the CCMA or a bargaining council, and did not plead any contractual breach or valid claim under the Mine Health and Safety Act. Furthermore, the applicant's claims have prescribed under the Prescription Act, as the cause of action arose no later than 28 February 2018 and the claim was only instituted in July 2…
Ellis Structural and Civil Engineers CC v Egan Property Group (Pty) Ltd (23229/2018) [2025] ZAGPPHC 671 (8 July 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
23229/2018
Judge
E M Kubushi
The court held that the debts under the written and oral agreements became due monthly as the plaintiff was entitled to issue invoices for services rendered. The power to issue invoices lay solely with the plaintiff, and its failure to do so could not delay the running of prescription. The last possible date for the debts to become due was July 2014, and prescription commenced running from August 2014. Summons was issued in April 2018, after the three-year prescription period had expired for all claims. The court found that the alleged interruptions of prescription in June 2015 and May 2016 d…
St Benedict's Abbey NPO v Eskom Holdings SOC Limited (2025/096450) [2025] ZALMPPHC 129 (2 July 2025)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
2025/096450
Judge
Kganyago
The High Court dismissed an urgent bid to stop Eskom from disconnecting electricity, finding the applicant had not met the test for an interim interdict.
Agenbag Motor Group v Nkitseng (Appeal) (CIV APP MG 13/2024) [2025] ZANWHC 110 (1 July 2025)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
CIV APP MG 13/2024
Judges
Oosthuizen-Senekal, C Mokhare
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant's claim for storage fees had prescribed under section 11(d) of the Prescription Act 68 of 1969, as the cause of action arose when the vehicle was first stored and not when the demand was made. The appellant failed to establish that the respondent was the correct party to be sued, as the vehicle was purchased by Ipolokeng Funeral Parlour and not by the respondent personally. The non-joinder of Ipolokeng Funeral Parlour was a fatal procedural irregularity, as it was the entity with a direct and substantial interest in the outcome. Furthermore, the…
Badenhorst N.O and Others v Adowa Infrastructure Managers (RF) (Pty) Ltd and Others (16888/2024) [2025] ZAWCHC 273 (30 June 2025)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
16888/2024
Judge
Slingers
The High Court held that the Tamric Trust acquired a 20m² encroachment area by acquisitive prescription after open, exclusive possession for over 30 years.
Meyer v Meyer and Others (1819/2020) [2025] ZAWCHC 268 (23 June 2025)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
1819/2020
Judge
Van Zyl AJ
High Court action over alleged fraud in family property sales failed; the court found Mrs Meyer knowingly signed the transactions and that the claims had prescribed.