ABSA Bank Ltd v Burmeister and Others (647/02) [2004] ZASCA 16; [2005] 3 All SA 409 (SCA); 2004 (5) SA 595 (SCA); (2004) 25 ILJ 1650 (SCA) (26 March 2004)

ABSA Bank Ltd v Burmeister and Others (647/02) [2004] ZASCA 16; [2005] 3 All SA 409 (SCA); 2004 (5) SA 595 (SCA); (2004) 25 ILJ 1650 (SCA) (26 March 2004)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 37D(1)(b) of the Pension Funds Act authorises only the original employer's pension fund to deduct amounts due to the employer from a member's benefits at the time of retirement or cessation of membership. The protection against attachment under section 37A(1) applies to the compulsory linked life annuity purchased from transferred pension benefits, and the exception in section 37D(1)(b) does not extend to subsequent funds. The court reasoned that the statutory framework and the purpose of the Act require a strict interpretation of the exception, limiting it to the employer's fund and not to any fund to which benefits may be transferred. The...

Citation
[2004] ZASCA 16
Parties
Appellant: ABSA Bank Limited; Respondent: Hendrik Jacobus Burmeister; Respondent: Sheriff of the High Court for the District of Bellville, Western Cape; Respondent: Sanlam Personal Portfolios (Pty) Ltd
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
26 March 2004
Case Number
647/02
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Scott, Mpati, Cameron, Nugent, Cloete
Legal Topics
Pension Fund Benefits, Attachment and Execution, Statutory Interpretation, Compulsory Annuity, Fraud and Dishonesty
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Pension Fund Benefits Attachment and Execution Statutory Interpretation Compulsory Annuity Fraud and Dishonesty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ABSA Bank Limited

Appellant

Hendrik Jacobus Burmeister

Respondent

Sheriff of the High Court for the District of Bellville, Western Cape

Respondent

Sanlam Personal Portfolios (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether section 37D(1)(b) of the Pension Funds Act permits an employer to access pension benefits after they have been transferred to a subsequent fund.
  2. 2 Whether the protection against attachment under section 37A(1) applies to a compulsory linked life annuity purchased from transferred pension benefits.
  3. 3 Whether the exception in section 37D(1)(b) extends to funds other than the original employer's pension fund.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 37D(1)(b) of the Pension Funds Act authorises only the original employer's pension fund to deduct amounts due to the employer from a member's benefits at the time of retirement or cessation of membership. The protection against attachment under section 37A(1) applies to the compulsory linked life annuity purchased from transferred pension benefits, and the exception in section 37D(1)(b) does not extend to subsequent funds. The court reasoned that the statutory framework and the purpose of the Act require a strict interpretation of the exception, limiting it to the employer's fund and not to any fund to which benefits may be transferred. The...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.
  • The attachment of the annuity is set aside.