Dean v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR1956/16)
Dean v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR1956/16) [2019] ZALCJHB 337 (3 December 2019)
The court found that the commissioner’s award was reasonable and supported by the evidence. The applicant failed to clock in and out as required by a rule introduced in October 2014, and his overtime claims for April and September 2015 could not be substantiated by clock cards. The commissioner drew a reasonable inference from the applicant’s failure to challenge prior penalties and the lack of clocking evidence. The denial of legal representation was subject to a separate ruling not challenged in this review. The grounds advanced by the applicant were without merit, and the review applicatio…
Source excerpt
- Unfair Dismissal
- Fraud And Dishonesty
- Arbitration Review
- Legal Representation
- Reasonableness Of Award