Absa Bank Ltd v Sager and Others (NCT/108118/2018/165) [2018] ZANCT 50 (31 July 2018)
The Tribunal found that the order confirming the debt re-arrangement agreement was based on an erroneous acceptance letter from ABSA, which did not reflect the true agreement between the parties. The repayment terms were clearly incorrect and not in accordance with the parties' intentions. As the respondents failed to oppose the application or file answering affidavits, the applicant's allegations were deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that the order was erroneously sought by the debt counsellor in the absence of ABSA and that rescission was warranted under section 165(a) of the National Credit Act.
- Citation
- [2018] ZANCT 50
- Parties
- Applicant: Absa Bank Ltd; Respondent: Benay Sager; Respondent: Nimesh Kantilal Keshav; Respondent: Deepti Keshav; Respondent: Direct Axis (SA) (Pty) Limited on behalf of Firstrand Bank Ltd; Respondent: Jet, on behalf of Edcon (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: RCS Cards (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Standard Bank of South Africa Limited; Respondent: Truworths Limited; Respondent: Wesbank, a division of Firstrand Bank Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2018
- Case Number
- NCT/108118/2018/165
- Procedural Posture
- Rescission Application / Hearing on Default Basis
- Outcome
- Application to rescind the Tribunal order is granted.
- Judges
- F Sibanda, J Simpson, A Potwana
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act Section 165, Rescission of Order, Debt Rearrangement, Default Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Absa Bank Ltd
Applicant
Benay Sager
Respondent
Nimesh Kantilal Keshav
Respondent
Deepti Keshav
Respondent
Direct Axis (SA) (Pty) Limited on behalf of Firstrand Bank Ltd
Respondent
Jet, on behalf of Edcon (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
RCS Cards (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Standard Bank of South Africa Limited
Respondent
Truworths Limited
Respondent
Wesbank, a division of Firstrand Bank Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rescission Application / Hearing on Default Basis
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal order confirming the debt re-arrangement agreement should be rescinded under section 165 of the National Credit Act.
- 2 Whether the order was erroneously sought or granted in the absence of a party affected by it.
- 3 Whether the repayment terms reflected in the order were based on an error.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the order confirming the debt re-arrangement agreement was based on an erroneous acceptance letter from ABSA, which did not reflect the true agreement between the parties. The repayment terms were clearly incorrect and not in accordance with the parties' intentions. As the respondents failed to oppose the application or file answering affidavits, the applicant's allegations were deemed admitted. The Tribunal concluded that the order was erroneously sought by the debt counsellor in the absence of ABSA and that rescission was warranted under section 165(a) of the National Credit Act.
Court Disposition
Application to rescind the Tribunal order is granted.
Orders
- The order confirming the debt re-arrangement as an order of the Tribunal, case number NCT/46982/2016/138, dated 26 June 2017, is hereby rescinded.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment