Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd v Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd (LM133Nov19) [2020] ZACT 80 (29 January 2020)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction does not result in any market overlaps or competition concerns, as the merging parties do not provide substitutable services and have no business relationship. Furthermore, there are no public interest concerns arising from the transaction. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in South Africa and approved the transaction unconditionally.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

02

Material facts

Parties

Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd

Applicant Counsel: C Thomas and L Granville

Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

K.2019302693 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Control / Approval

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant submitted that Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd is a newly established firm with no activities and that the acquisition of control over Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd and K.2019302693 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd will not result in any market overlaps or competition concerns. The applicant argued that the transaction is unlikely to affect competition or raise public interest issues.
Respondent
The Competition Commission argued that the merging parties do not provide substitutable services, nor do they have a business relationship. The Commission found that the transaction will not result in any overlaps in any market and does not raise any public interest concerns.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    Public interest considerations must be assessed in merger proceedings, including the effect on employment and the ability of small businesses to compete.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction does not result in any market overlaps or competition concerns, as the merging parties do not provide substitutable services and have no business relationship. Furthermore, there are no public interest concerns arising from the transaction. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in South Africa and approved the transaction unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd is a newly established firm with no activities, which further supports the absence of competition concerns.
  • The Tribunal observed that both Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd and K.2019302693 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd provide similar products and services, but the acquisition does not create any overlaps.

Court disposition

The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

  • The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2020] ZACT 80

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: LM133Nov19

In the matter between

Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd Primary

Acquiring Firm

And

Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd Primary

Target Firms

and K.2019302693 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd

Panel : Ms Y Carrim (Presiding Member), Ms A Ndoni (Tribunal Member), Prof. H Cheadle (Tribunal Member)

Heard on : 15 January 2020

Order Issued on : 15 January 2020

Reasons Issued on : 29 January 2020

REASONS

FOR DECISION

Approval

[1] On 15 January 2020, the Tribunal unconditionally approved the proposed transaction in terms of which Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd (Agile) is acquiring control over Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd (Averge) and K2019302693 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd (AVT2).

[2] The reasons for the approval of the proposed transaction follow.

Parties to the transaction

[3] The primary acquiring firm, Agile, is a newly established firm that does not have any activities. Agile is controlled by Agile Capital 400 (Pty) Ltd (Fund Manager) and Corvest 12 (Pty) Ltd (Corvest 12). Two individuals, Mr Ettiene de Wet Visser (Visser) and Mr Johannes Samuel Gouws (Gouws) also form part of the acquiring firm for the purpose of this transaction.

[4] The controllers of Agile are active in, inter alia, private equity, management buyouts and buy-ins and have investment holdings in various sectors.

[5] The primary target firms are Averge and AVT2. Averge is controlled by Visser, and AVT2 does not have any entity controlling it pre-merger.[1]

[6] Averge has five key divisions namely, (i) DC Power Systems, (ii) Energy, (iii) Telecommunications, (iv) Network Optimization and (v) Specialised services. In summation, Averge is a specialist distributor of a range of products which include supplying back-up

batteries and fibre optic components for use in the communications industry and supplying overhead line equipment for use in the energy sector. AVT2 provides the same products and services as Averge.

Proposed transaction and rationale

[7] The proposed transaction entails the acquisition of certain minority protections by Agile in Averge and AVT2 which will confer control over them. Post-merger, Averge will be controlled by Agile and Visser. AVT2 will be controlled by Agile, Visser and Gouws.

Impact on competition

[8] The Competition Commission (Commission) considered the activities of the merging parties and found that the proposed transaction will not result in any overlaps in any market. This is because the merging parties do not provide services that are substitutable, nor do the merging parties have a business relationship.

Public interest

[9] The proposed transaction does not raise any public interest concerns.

Conclusion

[10] In view of the above, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in South Africa. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.

Ms Yasmin Carrim

Ms Andiswa Ndoni and Prof. Halton Cheadle concurring.

Date: 29 January 2020

Tribunal Case Manager : Kgothatso Kgobe

For the Merging Parties: C Thomas and L Granville of Cliffe Dekker Hofmyer

For the Commission: N Msiza and M Aphane

[1] Hearing Transcript, page 2 lines 16-17.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.