Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd v Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd (LM133Nov19) [2020] ZACT 80 (29 January 2020)
- Citation
- [2020] ZACT 80
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, A Ndoni, H Cheadle
- Case number
- LM133Nov19
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- Y Carrim, A Ndoni, H Cheadle
- Case number
- LM133Nov19
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction does not result in any market overlaps or competition concerns, as the merging parties do not provide substitutable services and have no business relationship. Furthermore, there are no public interest concerns arising from the transaction. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in South Africa and approved the transaction unconditionally.
Court disposition
The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
02
Material facts
Parties
Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd
Applicant Counsel: C Thomas and L GranvilleAverge Technologies (Pty) Ltd
RespondentK.2019302693 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Control / Approval
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed transaction will substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in South Africa.
- 02
Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant submitted that Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd is a newly established firm with no activities and that the acquisition of control over Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd and K.2019302693 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd will not result in any market overlaps or competition concerns. The applicant argued that the transaction is unlikely to affect competition or raise public interest issues.
- Respondent
- The Competition Commission argued that the merging parties do not provide substitutable services, nor do they have a business relationship. The Commission found that the transaction will not result in any overlaps in any market and does not raise any public interest concerns.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
A merger may only be prohibited if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market.
- 02
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
Public interest considerations must be assessed in merger proceedings, including the effect on employment and the ability of small businesses to compete.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction does not result in any market overlaps or competition concerns, as the merging parties do not provide substitutable services and have no business relationship. Furthermore, there are no public interest concerns arising from the transaction. The Tribunal concluded that the transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in South Africa and approved the transaction unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd is a newly established firm with no activities, which further supports the absence of competition concerns.
- The Tribunal observed that both Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd and K.2019302693 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd provide similar products and services, but the acquisition does not create any overlaps.
Court disposition
The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
- The proposed transaction is approved unconditionally.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: LM133Nov19
In the matter between
Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd Primary
Acquiring Firm
And
Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd Primary
Target Firms
and K.2019302693 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd
Panel : Ms Y Carrim (Presiding Member), Ms A Ndoni (Tribunal Member), Prof. H Cheadle (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 15 January 2020
Order Issued on : 15 January 2020
Reasons Issued on : 29 January 2020
REASONS
FOR DECISION
Approval
[1] On 15 January 2020, the Tribunal unconditionally approved the proposed transaction in terms of which Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd (Agile) is acquiring control over Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd (Averge) and K2019302693 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd (AVT2).
[2] The reasons for the approval of the proposed transaction follow.
Parties to the transaction
[3] The primary acquiring firm, Agile, is a newly established firm that does not have any activities. Agile is controlled by Agile Capital 400 (Pty) Ltd (Fund Manager) and Corvest 12 (Pty) Ltd (Corvest 12). Two individuals, Mr Ettiene de Wet Visser (Visser) and Mr Johannes Samuel Gouws (Gouws) also form part of the acquiring firm for the purpose of this transaction.
[4] The controllers of Agile are active in, inter alia, private equity, management buyouts and buy-ins and have investment holdings in various sectors.
[5] The primary target firms are Averge and AVT2. Averge is controlled by Visser, and AVT2 does not have any entity controlling it pre-merger.[1]
[6] Averge has five key divisions namely, (i) DC Power Systems, (ii) Energy, (iii) Telecommunications, (iv) Network Optimization and (v) Specialised services. In summation, Averge is a specialist distributor of a range of products which include supplying back-up
batteries and fibre optic components for use in the communications industry and supplying overhead line equipment for use in the energy sector. AVT2 provides the same products and services as Averge.
Proposed transaction and rationale
[7] The proposed transaction entails the acquisition of certain minority protections by Agile in Averge and AVT2 which will confer control over them. Post-merger, Averge will be controlled by Agile and Visser. AVT2 will be controlled by Agile, Visser and Gouws.
Impact on competition
[8] The Competition Commission (Commission) considered the activities of the merging parties and found that the proposed transaction will not result in any overlaps in any market. This is because the merging parties do not provide services that are substitutable, nor do the merging parties have a business relationship.
Public interest
[9] The proposed transaction does not raise any public interest concerns.
Conclusion
[10] In view of the above, we concluded that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market in South Africa. In addition, no public interest issues arise from the proposed transaction. Accordingly, we approved the proposed transaction unconditionally.
Ms Yasmin Carrim
Ms Andiswa Ndoni and Prof. Halton Cheadle concurring.
Date: 29 January 2020
Tribunal Case Manager : Kgothatso Kgobe
For the Merging Parties: C Thomas and L Granville of Cliffe Dekker Hofmyer
For the Commission: N Msiza and M Aphane
[1] Hearing Transcript, page 2 lines 16-17.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.