Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2020] ZACT 80

Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd v Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd (LM133Nov19)

Agile Capital Four (Pty) Ltd v Averge Technologies (Pty) Ltd (LM133Nov19) [2020] ZACT 80 (29 January 2020)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Agile Capital Four’s acquisition of control over Averge Technologies and K.2019302693, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Minority Protections
  • Public Interest
  • Market Overlap
  • Competition-law
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2019] ZACT 22

Government Employees Pension Fund v lsago @N12 Develeopment Proprietary Limited (LM184Sep18)

Government Employees Pension Fund v lsago @N12 Develeopment Proprietary Limited (LM184Sep18) [2019] ZACT 22 (10 January 2019)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved GEPF’s acquisition of a 60% share in target properties owned by lsago, finding no likely competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest
  • Market Overlap
  • Property Development
  • Merger-control
  • Public-interest
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACT 13

Business Venture Investments No 1953 (Pty) Ltd v Afrit Group (Pty) Ltd (LM022Apr17)

Business Venture Investments No 1953 (Pty) Ltd v Afrit Group (Pty) Ltd (LM022Apr17) [2017] ZACT 13 (29 June 2017)

The Competition Tribunal approved an unopposed merger between Business Venture Investments No 1953 (Pty) Ltd and Afrit Group (Pty) Ltd, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest
  • Market Overlap
  • Employment Effects
  • Merger-control
  • Public-interest
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACT 3

Setso Holdco Proprietary Limited v Setso Property Fund Proprietary Limited (LM185Dec16)

Setso Holdco Proprietary Limited v Setso Property Fund Proprietary Limited (LM185Dec16) [2017] ZACT 3 (11 January 2017)

The Competition Tribunal approved unconditionally the acquisition of Setso Property by Setso Holdco, finding no competition overlap or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest
  • Market Overlap
  • Employment Effects
  • Merger-control
  • Public-interest
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2016] ZACT 107

Main Street 1463 Proprietary Limited v Acorp Gifts Proprietary Limited (LM118Sep16)

Main Street 1463 Proprietary Limited v Acorp Gifts Proprietary Limited (LM118Sep16) [2016] ZACT 107 (23 November 2016)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Main Street 1463’s acquisition of control over Acorp Gifts, finding no competition overlap or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Substantial Prevention Or Lessening Of Competition
  • Public Interest
  • Market Overlap
  • Merger-control
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2016] ZACT 63

Nestle SA v R and R Ice Cream Public Limited Company (LM026MAY16)

Nestle SA v R and R Ice Cream Public Limited Company (LM026MAY16) [2016] ZACT 63 (12 August 2016)

The Competition Tribunal approved Nestle’s merger with R&R Ice Cream unconditionally, finding no substantial competition or employment concerns.

  • Horizontal Merger
  • Non Compete Obligation
  • Public Interest
  • Market Overlap
  • Employment Effects
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2016] ZACT 22

Bongicel (Pty) Ltd v Lusitania Pty Ltd (LM224Jan16)

Bongicel (Pty) Ltd v Lusitania Pty Ltd (LM224Jan16) [2016] ZACT 22 (23 March 2016)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Bongicel’s acquisition of Lusitania, finding no competitive overlap and no significant public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest
  • Market Overlap
  • Competition-law
  • Merger-control
  • Public-interest
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2016] ZACT 14

Government Employees Pension Fund, duly represented herein by the Public Investment Corporation SOC Limited v Mining and Gas Services Proprietary Limited (LM214Jan16)

Government Employees Pension Fund, duly represented herein by the Public Investment Corporation SOC Limited v Mining and Gas Services Proprietary Limited (LM214Jan16) [2016] ZACT 14 (9 March 2016)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved GEPF’s acquisition of 49% of MOGS, finding no market overlap and no adverse public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest
  • Joint Control
  • Market Overlap
  • Employment Effects
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2015] ZACT 75

Ompe GP IV Proprietary Limited v Middle Road Packers Proprietary Limited (LM170Nov15)

Ompe GP IV Proprietary Limited v Middle Road Packers Proprietary Limited (LM170Nov15) [2015] ZACT 75 (7 December 2015)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved OMPE GP IV’s acquisition of 31% of Middle Road Packers, finding no market overlap, competition concern, or public interest issue.

  • Merger Control
  • Substantial Lessening Of Competition
  • Public Interest
  • Market Overlap
  • Merger-control
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2015] ZACT 82

Government Employees Pension Fund v Siyanda Resources (Pty) Ltd (LM15Aug15)

Government Employees Pension Fund v Siyanda Resources (Pty) Ltd (LM15Aug15) [2015] ZACT 82 (4 November 2015)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved the merger between the Government Employees Pension Fund and Siyanda Resources after finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Joint Control
  • Public Interest
  • Market Overlap
  • Merger-control
  • Joint-control
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.