Ajose v S (A624/2017) [2019] ZAGPPHC 1083 (14 May 2019)

Ajose v S (A624/2017) [2019] ZAGPPHC 1083 (14 May 2019)

The court found that the complainant's evidence was credible and sufficiently corroborated by her emotional distress and panic attacks. The appellant's denial was inconsistent and unsupported by his witnesses. The State proved two counts of rape and three counts of sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt, not the eight counts of rape originally charged. The appellant abused a position of trust and committed repeated sexual offences against a minor. No substantial or compelling circumstances justified a deviation from the prescribed life sentence for rape. The sentences for sexual assault and intimidation were appropriate given the gravity of the offences and the complainant's...

Citation
[2019] ZAGPPHC 1083
Parties
Appellant: A Ajose; Respondent: The State
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 May 2019
Case Number
A624/2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal partially upheld; convictions and sentences in the Regional Court set aside and replaced with convictions for one count of intimidation, two counts of rape, and three counts of sexual assault. Sentences imposed: three years imprisonment for intimidation, life imprisonment for each count of rape, and eight...
Judges
Neukircher, Rangata
Legal Topics
Rape of Minor, Intimidation Act, Sexual Assault, Sentencing Principles, Single Witness Caution, Competent Verdicts
Criminal Law Rape of Minor Intimidation Act Sexual Assault Sentencing Principles Single Witness Caution Competent Verdicts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A Ajose

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was correctly convicted on eight counts of rape and one count of intimidation.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence supported convictions for rape or sexual assault on each count.
  3. 3 Whether the prescribed sentence of life imprisonment was appropriate given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the complainant's evidence was credible and sufficiently corroborated by her emotional distress and panic attacks. The appellant's denial was inconsistent and unsupported by his witnesses. The State proved two counts of rape and three counts of sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt, not the eight counts of rape originally charged. The appellant abused a position of trust and committed repeated sexual offences against a minor. No substantial or compelling circumstances justified a deviation from the prescribed life sentence for rape. The sentences for sexual assault and intimidation were appropriate given the gravity of the offences and the complainant's...

Court Disposition

Appeal partially upheld; convictions and sentences in the Regional Court set aside and replaced with convictions for one count of intimidation, two counts of rape, and three counts of sexual assault. Sentences imposed: three years imprisonment for intimidation, life imprisonment for each count of rape, and eight...

Orders

  • The convictions and sentences in the Regional Court are set aside.
  • The appellant is found guilty of one count of intimidation, two counts of rape, and three counts of sexual assault.