Bester obo C & E.N v Road Accident Fund (3200/2019) [2024] ZAECMKHC 67 (30 May 2024)

Bester obo C & E.N v Road Accident Fund (3200/2019) [2024] ZAECMKHC 67 (30 May 2024)

The court exercised its discretion under Rule 38(2) to allow evidence of past hospital and medical expenses to be adduced by affidavit, as the defendant did not oppose this method and the evidence was undisputed. The court found that payment of medical expenses by a medical aid scheme does not absolve the defendant of liability to the plaintiff. The principle of res inter alios acta applies, meaning the defendant cannot benefit from payments made by third parties such as medical aids. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the expenses from the defendant and is obliged to reimburse the medical scheme upon receipt. There is no legal justification for the defendant to avoid payment of these...

Citation
[2024] ZAECMKHC 67
Parties
Plaintiff: Johan Bester obo C[...] & E[...] N[...]; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
30 May 2024
Case Number
3200/2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Determination of Past Hospital and Medical Expenses; Other Heads of Damages Settled; Loss of Support Postponed Sine Die
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for past hospital and medical expenses succeeds; defendant is ordered to pay specified amounts and costs.
Judges
Metu
Legal Topics
Road Accident Fund Act, Collateral Benefits, Medical Expenses Reimbursement, Rule 38 Evidence, Subrogation, Costs of Suit

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Johan Bester obo C[...] & E[...] N[...]

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Determination of Past Hospital and Medical Expenses; Other Heads of Damages Settled; Loss of Support Postponed Sine Die

  1. 1 Whether evidence of past hospital and medical expenses may be adduced by affidavit.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to compensation for past hospital and medical expenses paid by a medical aid scheme.
  3. 3 Whether costs should be reserved for later determination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion under Rule 38(2) to allow evidence of past hospital and medical expenses to be adduced by affidavit, as the defendant did not oppose this method and the evidence was undisputed. The court found that payment of medical expenses by a medical aid scheme does not absolve the defendant of liability to the plaintiff. The principle of res inter alios acta applies, meaning the defendant cannot benefit from payments made by third parties such as medical aids. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the expenses from the defendant and is obliged to reimburse the medical scheme upon receipt. There is no legal justification for the defendant to avoid payment of these...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for past hospital and medical expenses succeeds; defendant is ordered to pay specified amounts and costs.

Orders

  • The Defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff’s past hospital and medical expenses for C[...] N[...] in the sum of R43,258.20 and for E[...] N[...] in the sum of R26,848.48, payment to be made into the Trust Account of Plaintiff’s Attorneys, AC De Sousa Attorneys.
  • The Defendant is liable for the costs of suit, including cost of Counsel on Scale B and costs of reservation and attendance upon consultations with Mr. Jean du Rand (Industrial Psychologist), Human & Morris (Actuaries), and Karen Andrews (Clinical Psychologist).