Billion Group (Pty) Ltd v Ntshangase and Others (JR1449/2017) [2018] ZALCJHB 211; (2018) 39 ILJ 2516 (LC) (20 June 2018)
The court found that while Ntshangase resigned and claimed intolerable conditions, the objective evidence did not support his assertion that the employer made continued employment intolerable. The initial email suggesting disciplinary action was not followed by any actual steps to suspend or discipline him. Instead, the employer issued a verbal warning and offered him options to improve his performance or seek alternative employment, including additional resources to assist him. The employer also attempted to persuade him to reconsider his resignation. The court held that Ntshangase had a clear choice to remain employed and was not compelled to resign. His ongoing anxiety was not...
- Citation
- [2018] ZALCJHB 211
- Parties
- Applicant: Billion Group (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Londizwi Ntshangase; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Silas Ramushawana (N.O.)
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2018
- Case Number
- JR1449/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- The arbitration award in favour of the third respondent is reviewed and set aside. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- Lagrange
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Review of Arbitration Award, Intolerable Work Conditions, Employee Resignation, Onus of Proof, Disciplinary Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Billion Group (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Londizwi Ntshangase
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Silas Ramushawana (N.O.)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the third respondent, Mr Ntshangase, was constructively dismissed by the applicant.
- 2 Whether the arbitrator's finding of constructive dismissal was justified on the evidence before him.
- 3 Whether the employer's conduct rendered continued employment intolerable for the employee.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while Ntshangase resigned and claimed intolerable conditions, the objective evidence did not support his assertion that the employer made continued employment intolerable. The initial email suggesting disciplinary action was not followed by any actual steps to suspend or discipline him. Instead, the employer issued a verbal warning and offered him options to improve his performance or seek alternative employment, including additional resources to assist him. The employer also attempted to persuade him to reconsider his resignation. The court held that Ntshangase had a clear choice to remain employed and was not compelled to resign. His ongoing anxiety was not...
Court Disposition
The arbitration award in favour of the third respondent is reviewed and set aside. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The arbitration award issued under case number GATW 16008-16 and dated 3 July 2017 is reviewed and set aside.
- No order is made as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment