Bohica Business Consulting CC v Bathusi Investments (PTY) LTD (6229/2013) [2017] ZAGPPHC 1118 (8 December 2017)

Bohica Business Consulting CC v Bathusi Investments (PTY) LTD (6229/2013) [2017] ZAGPPHC 1118 (8 December 2017)

The court found that a contract was validly concluded between the plaintiff and Buthelezi and Mhlongo, acting on behalf of a company to be formed or acquired. The written proposal, although unsigned by the defendant, was accepted and acted upon by both parties. The defendant, after being acquired by Buthelezi and Mhlongo, accepted the benefits of the contract by making substantial payments and never repudiated the agreement. This conduct amounted to tacit ratification of the contract. Even if the defendant argued that payments were made under a different arrangement, its conduct estopped it from denying ratification, as the plaintiff relied on this representation to its detriment. The...

Citation
[2017] ZAGPPHC 1118
Parties
Plaintiff: Bohica Business Consulting CC; Defendant: Bathusi Investments (PTY) LTD
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
8 December 2017
Case Number
6229/2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Judges
Brano
Legal Topics
Contract Formation, Ratification, Estoppel, Oral and Written Agreements, Agency Principles
Commercial and Corporate Contract Formation Ratification Estoppel Oral and Written Agreements Agency Principles

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bohica Business Consulting CC

Plaintiff

Bathusi Investments (PTY) LTD

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a contract was validly and bindingly concluded between the parties, in part orally and in part in writing.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant company, which was acquired after the contract was concluded, can be held liable under the contract.
  3. 3 Whether the conduct of the defendant amounted to ratification or estoppel regarding the contract.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that a contract was validly concluded between the plaintiff and Buthelezi and Mhlongo, acting on behalf of a company to be formed or acquired. The written proposal, although unsigned by the defendant, was accepted and acted upon by both parties. The defendant, after being acquired by Buthelezi and Mhlongo, accepted the benefits of the contract by making substantial payments and never repudiated the agreement. This conduct amounted to tacit ratification of the contract. Even if the defendant argued that payments were made under a different arrangement, its conduct estopped it from denying ratification, as the plaintiff relied on this representation to its detriment. The...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Orders

  • The defendant must pay the plaintiff the amount of R648,911.67 together with interest at 15.5% per annum from the date of service of summons until final payment.
  • The defendant must pay the costs of suit.