Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited and Orley Foods (Proprietary) Limited (108/LM/OCT07) [2007] ZACT 102 (12 December 2007)
- Citation
- [2007] ZACT 102
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- DH Lewis, Y Carrim, M Mokuena
- Case number
- 108/LM/OCT07
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- DH Lewis, Y Carrim, M Mokuena
- Case number
- 108/LM/OCT07
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the products manufactured by the acquiring firms do not overlap or compete with those of Orley Foods, and there is no supply relationship between them. Therefore, the merger does not raise horizontal or vertical competition concerns. The transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Furthermore, there are no negative effects on employment and no significant public interest concerns. The merger is unconditionally approved.
Court disposition
The proposed merger is unconditionally approved.
Orders
- The merger between Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited and Orley Foods (Proprietary) Limited is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited
Applicant Counsel: Metier, LibstarOrley Foods (Proprietary) Limited
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Application / Decision on Approval
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the proposed merger between Calshelf Investments 152 and Orley Foods is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market.
- 02
Whether the transaction raises any significant public interest concerns, including effects on employment.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The merging parties argued that the transaction is a complementary fit, allowing Orley Foods to broaden its market range through participation in the acquiring firms' food solutions platform and to achieve a favourable BEE status. For the acquiring firms, the merger would increase scale and improve the quality of earnings and asset base. They submitted that there is no overlap or competition between the products of the acquiring firms and Orley Foods, and no supply relationship exists between them.
- Respondent
- The Competition Commission did not oppose the merger and concurred with the merging parties' submissions, finding no horizontal or vertical concerns and no negative effects on employment or public interest.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
A merger may not be approved if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market, unless the public interest justifies approval.
- 02
Tribunal precedent
The absence of product overlap or supply relationships between merging parties indicates no horizontal or vertical competition concerns.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the products manufactured by the acquiring firms do not overlap or compete with those of Orley Foods, and there is no supply relationship between them. Therefore, the merger does not raise horizontal or vertical competition concerns. The transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Furthermore, there are no negative effects on employment and no significant public interest concerns. The merger is unconditionally approved.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted that the transaction would enable Orley Foods to achieve a favourable BEE status, which is consistent with public interest objectives.
- The merger provides an opportunity for the acquiring firms to increase their scale and improve their asset base, but these factors do not raise competition concerns in this instance.
Court disposition
The proposed merger is unconditionally approved.
- The merger between Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited and Orley Foods (Proprietary) Limited is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
IN THE COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
CASE NO: 108/LM/OCT07
In the matter between:
CALSHELF INVESTMENTS 152 (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED Acquiring Firm
And
ORLEY FOODS (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED Target firms
______________
Panel : DH Lewis (Presiding Member), Y Carrim (Tribunal Member), and
M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)
Heard on : 12 December 2007
Order issued on : 12 December 2007
Reasons issued on : 12 December 2007
REASONS
FOR DECISION
THE PARTIES
[1] The primary acquiring firm is Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited (âCalshelf 152â) a new shelf company which is a subsidiary of Liberty Star Consumer Holdings (Pty) Limited (âLibstarâ).1 Libstar controls various firms namely: Chet Chemical Products (Pty) Limited; Dickon Hall Foods (Pty) Limited; Liberty Star Food Solutions (Pty) Limited; Gourmet Consumer Holdings (Pty) Limited, which controls Rialto Foods (Pty) Limited; and Retailer Brands (Pty) Limited.
[2] The acquiring firms have interests mainly in the foods sector. Dickon Hall manufactures, packages and distributes âdryâ and âwetâ food products; Gourmet Consumer Holdings imports specialty French, Italian and Spanish foodstuffs; Retailer Brands distributes jelly, spices, instant soup, spicy sauces and corn flour. The acquiring firms supply their products throughout South Africa, but primarily provide their services to members of their group, and not to third parties.
[3] The primary target firm is Orley Foods (Pty) Ltd (âOrley Foodsâ) which is controlled by Orley Holdings (Pty) Ltd (âOrley Holdingsâ). Orley Holdings is jointly controlled by two Trusts: the Grandi Trust (âGrandiâ) and the SMA Trust (âSMAâ).
[4] Orley Foods manufactures a wide range of ingredients for the retail, wholesale, food service and manufacturing sectors of the economy which includes chocolate products, syrups and sugar based products, non-dairy whips, toppings and panned and coated products. These products are distributed throughout South Africa.
THE TRANSACTION
[5] This proposed transaction is pursuant to a sale of business agreement entered into by the merging parties on 24 July 2007, in which Calshelf 152 through Libstar, will purchase Orley Foodsâ entire business as a going concern. Simultaneously Calshelf 152, Grandi, SMA and the two managing directors of Orley Foods, namely; Abrahams and Janik, entered into a shareholders agreement, in which joint control of the Calshelf 152 was conferred on Libstar, Grandi and SMA, and in which during 1 January 2009 and 2010, Libstar has a call option entitling it to acquire the interests of Grandi and SMA in Calshelf 152. During the same period, Grandi and SMA have put an option against Libstar which entitles them to dispose of their interests in Calshelf 152 to Libstar.
[6] The merging parties submitted that the purpose of these shareholder arrangements is to enable the business of Orley Foods to be continued by Calshelf 152 under the management of Abrahams and Janik, through Grandi and SMA.
[7] As a result of the implementation of the proposed transaction, Calshelf 152 will remain the subsidiary of Libstar which will hold 70% of the equity in Orley Foods, and Calshelf 152 will be jointly controlled by Libstar, Grandi and SMA, where Grandi and SMA will together hold 30% of the equity in Calshelf 152.
RATIONALE FOR THE
TRANSACTION
[8] According to the merging parties, this transaction is a complementary fit which will allow Orley Foods to broaden its market range by participating in the acquiring firmsâ food solutions/out-of home platform, and further enable it to achieve a favourable BEE status. For the acquiring firms, this transaction provides an opportunity to increase their scale, as well as improve the quality of earnings and asset base.
COMPETITION EVALUATION
[9] The products manufactured by the acquiring firms do not in any way overlap or compete with any of the products manufactured by Orley Foods. Furthermore Orley Foods does not supply any products to any of the acquiring firms nor do any of the acquiring firms supply any products to Orley Foods. Consequently this merger does not raise any horizontal or vertical concerns.
CONCLUSION
[10] We find that this proposed merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Furthermore, no negative effects on employment will result, and no significant public interest concerns are raised. Accordingly the proposed transaction is unconditionally approved.
___ 12 December 2007
D Lewis Date
Tribunal Member
Y Carrim and M Mokuena concur in the judgment of D Lewis
Tribunal Researcher: L Xaba
For the merging parties : Metier, and Libstar
For the Commission : I Mohlala, and L Khumalo
(Mergers and Acquisitions)
1 There are other acquiring firms to this transaction which include Royal Bafokeng Libstar (Pty) Ltd (âRBH Libstarâ); Lereko Metier Capital Growth Fund (âLMCGF); Royal Bafokeng Holdings (Pty) Ltd (âRBHâ); RBH Industrial Holdings (Pty) Ltd (âRBH Industrialâ) and; The Bofokeng Nation (âRBNâ)
3
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.