Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited and Orley Foods (Proprietary) Limited (108/LM/OCT07) [2007] ZACT 102 (12 December 2007)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the products manufactured by the acquiring firms do not overlap or compete with those of Orley Foods, and there is no supply relationship between them. Therefore, the merger does not raise horizontal or vertical competition concerns. The transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Furthermore, there are no negative effects on employment and no significant public interest concerns. The merger is unconditionally approved.

Court disposition

The proposed merger is unconditionally approved.

Orders

  • The merger between Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited and Orley Foods (Proprietary) Limited is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited

Applicant Counsel: Metier, Libstar

Orley Foods (Proprietary) Limited

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Application / Decision on Approval

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The merging parties argued that the transaction is a complementary fit, allowing Orley Foods to broaden its market range through participation in the acquiring firms' food solutions platform and to achieve a favourable BEE status. For the acquiring firms, the merger would increase scale and improve the quality of earnings and asset base. They submitted that there is no overlap or competition between the products of the acquiring firms and Orley Foods, and no supply relationship exists between them.
Respondent
The Competition Commission did not oppose the merger and concurred with the merging parties' submissions, finding no horizontal or vertical concerns and no negative effects on employment or public interest.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    A merger may not be approved if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market, unless the public interest justifies approval.

  2. 02

    Tribunal precedent

    The absence of product overlap or supply relationships between merging parties indicates no horizontal or vertical competition concerns.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the products manufactured by the acquiring firms do not overlap or compete with those of Orley Foods, and there is no supply relationship between them. Therefore, the merger does not raise horizontal or vertical competition concerns. The transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Furthermore, there are no negative effects on employment and no significant public interest concerns. The merger is unconditionally approved.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that the transaction would enable Orley Foods to achieve a favourable BEE status, which is consistent with public interest objectives.
  • The merger provides an opportunity for the acquiring firms to increase their scale and improve their asset base, but these factors do not raise competition concerns in this instance.

Court disposition

The proposed merger is unconditionally approved.

  • The merger between Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited and Orley Foods (Proprietary) Limited is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2007] ZACT 102

IN THE COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

CASE NO: 108/LM/OCT07

In the matter between:

CALSHELF INVESTMENTS 152 (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED Acquiring Firm

And

ORLEY FOODS (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED Target firms

______________

Panel : DH Lewis (Presiding Member), Y Carrim (Tribunal Member), and

M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)

Heard on : 12 December 2007

Order issued on : 12 December 2007

Reasons issued on : 12 December 2007

REASONS

FOR DECISION

THE PARTIES

[1] The primary acquiring firm is Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited (“Calshelf 152”) a new shelf company which is a subsidiary of Liberty Star Consumer Holdings (Pty) Limited (“Libstar”).1 Libstar controls various firms namely: Chet Chemical Products (Pty) Limited; Dickon Hall Foods (Pty) Limited; Liberty Star Food Solutions (Pty) Limited; Gourmet Consumer Holdings (Pty) Limited, which controls Rialto Foods (Pty) Limited; and Retailer Brands (Pty) Limited.

[2] The acquiring firms have interests mainly in the foods sector. Dickon Hall manufactures, packages and distributes “dry” and “wet” food products; Gourmet Consumer Holdings imports specialty French, Italian and Spanish foodstuffs; Retailer Brands distributes jelly, spices, instant soup, spicy sauces and corn flour. The acquiring firms supply their products throughout South Africa, but primarily provide their services to members of their group, and not to third parties.

[3] The primary target firm is Orley Foods (Pty) Ltd (“Orley Foods”) which is controlled by Orley Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“Orley Holdings”). Orley Holdings is jointly controlled by two Trusts: the Grandi Trust (“Grandi”) and the SMA Trust (“SMA”).

[4] Orley Foods manufactures a wide range of ingredients for the retail, wholesale, food service and manufacturing sectors of the economy which includes chocolate products, syrups and sugar based products, non-dairy whips, toppings and panned and coated products. These products are distributed throughout South Africa.

THE TRANSACTION

[5] This proposed transaction is pursuant to a sale of business agreement entered into by the merging parties on 24 July 2007, in which Calshelf 152 through Libstar, will purchase Orley Foods’ entire business as a going concern. Simultaneously Calshelf 152, Grandi, SMA and the two managing directors of Orley Foods, namely; Abrahams and Janik, entered into a shareholders agreement, in which joint control of the Calshelf 152 was conferred on Libstar, Grandi and SMA, and in which during 1 January 2009 and 2010, Libstar has a call option entitling it to acquire the interests of Grandi and SMA in Calshelf 152. During the same period, Grandi and SMA have put an option against Libstar which entitles them to dispose of their interests in Calshelf 152 to Libstar.

[6] The merging parties submitted that the purpose of these shareholder arrangements is to enable the business of Orley Foods to be continued by Calshelf 152 under the management of Abrahams and Janik, through Grandi and SMA.

[7] As a result of the implementation of the proposed transaction, Calshelf 152 will remain the subsidiary of Libstar which will hold 70% of the equity in Orley Foods, and Calshelf 152 will be jointly controlled by Libstar, Grandi and SMA, where Grandi and SMA will together hold 30% of the equity in Calshelf 152.

RATIONALE FOR THE

TRANSACTION

[8] According to the merging parties, this transaction is a complementary fit which will allow Orley Foods to broaden its market range by participating in the acquiring firms’ food solutions/out-of home platform, and further enable it to achieve a favourable BEE status. For the acquiring firms, this transaction provides an opportunity to increase their scale, as well as improve the quality of earnings and asset base.

COMPETITION EVALUATION

[9] The products manufactured by the acquiring firms do not in any way overlap or compete with any of the products manufactured by Orley Foods. Furthermore Orley Foods does not supply any products to any of the acquiring firms nor do any of the acquiring firms supply any products to Orley Foods. Consequently this merger does not raise any horizontal or vertical concerns.

CONCLUSION

[10] We find that this proposed merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any market. Furthermore, no negative effects on employment will result, and no significant public interest concerns are raised. Accordingly the proposed transaction is unconditionally approved.

___ 12 December 2007

D Lewis Date

Tribunal Member

Y Carrim and M Mokuena concur in the judgment of D Lewis

Tribunal Researcher: L Xaba

For the merging parties : Metier, and Libstar

For the Commission : I Mohlala, and L Khumalo

(Mergers and Acquisitions)

1 There are other acquiring firms to this transaction which include Royal Bafokeng Libstar (Pty) Ltd (“RBH Libstar”); Lereko Metier Capital Growth Fund (“LMCGF); Royal Bafokeng Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“RBH”); RBH Industrial Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“RBH Industrial”) and; The Bofokeng Nation (“RBN”)

3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.