Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 71

Steinhoff International Holdings Ltd v KAP International Holdings Ltd (101/LM/Nov11)

Steinhoff International Holdings Ltd v KAP International Holdings Ltd (101/LM/Nov11) [2012] ZACT 71; [2012] 2 CPLR 531 (CT) (15 August 2012)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
101/LM/Nov11
Judges
Yasmin Carrim, Medi Mokuena, Takalani Madima

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Steinhoff’s acquisition of KAP, finding limited competition concerns, no foreclosure risk, and no public interest issues.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Market Allocation
  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 61

Petroleum Oil and Gas Corporation of South Africa (SOC) Ltd v Certain Offshore Oil and Gas Assets in South Africa Held by Pioneer Natural Resources South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another (55/LM/May12)

Petroleum Oil and Gas Corporation of South Africa (SOC) Ltd v Certain Offshore Oil and Gas Assets in South Africa Held by Pioneer Natural Resources South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another (55/LM/May12) [2012] ZACT 61; [2012] 2 CPLR 516 (CT) (20 July 2012)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
55/LM/May12
Judges
Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, Andreas Wessels

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved PetroSA’s acquisition of offshore oil and gas assets from Pioneer SA and PSC, finding no substantial competition concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 50

Macsteel Services Centres SA (Pty) Ltd v Samson Property Investments SA (Pty) Ltd (52/LM/May12)

Macsteel Services Centres SA (Pty) Ltd v Samson Property Investments SA (Pty) Ltd (52/LM/May12) [2012] ZACT 50 (9 July 2012)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
52/LM/May12
Judges
Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim, Andiswa Ndoni

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Macsteel’s acquisition of Samson Property Investments, finding no substantial competition or foreclosure concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Market Share Calculation
  • Merger-control
  • Horizontal-merger-analysis
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2009] ZACT 30

Crest Chemicals (Pty) Ltd v CH Chemicals (Pty) Ltd (131/LM/Dec08)

Crest Chemicals (Pty) Ltd v CH Chemicals (Pty) Ltd (131/LM/Dec08) [2009] ZACT 30 (12 May 2009)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
131/LM/Dec08
Judges
D Lewis, N Manoim, Y Carrim

The Competition Tribunal approved Crest Chemicals’ acquisition of CH Chemicals’ chemicals distribution business, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Market Definition
  • Foreclosure
  • Public Interest
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2009] ZACT 1

Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited v WM Eachus and Company (Pty) Ltd (120/LM/Nov08)

Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited v WM Eachus and Company (Pty) Ltd (120/LM/Nov08) [2009] ZACT 1; [2009] 1 CPLR 149 (CT) (12 January 2009)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
120/LM/Nov08
Judges
D Lewis, N Manoim, Y Carrim

The Competition Tribunal approved IDC’s acquisition of WM Eachus unconditionally, finding no substantial competition harm and no public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Integration
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Input Foreclosure
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2008] ZACT 61

ABSA Group Limited v Woolworths Financial Services (Pty) Ltd (59/LM/MAY08)

ABSA Group Limited v Woolworths Financial Services (Pty) Ltd (59/LM/MAY08) [2008] ZACT 61 (31 July 2008)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
59/LM/MAY08
Judges
D Lewis, Y Carrim, L Reyburn

The Competition Tribunal approved ABSA Group’s acquisition of a 50% plus 1 share stake in Woolworths Financial Services, finding no substantial lessening of competition.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Relationships
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Merger-control
  • Horizontal-merger-analysis
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2008] ZACT 49

Chemical Services Limited v Chemfit Industrial Holdings (42/LM/Apr08)

Chemical Services Limited v Chemfit Industrial Holdings (42/LM/Apr08) [2008] ZACT 49; [2008] 2 CPLR 238 (CT) (4 July 2008)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
42/LM/Apr08
Judges
D Lewis, Y Carrim, N Manoim

The Tribunal unconditionally approved Chemical Services Limited’s merger with Chemfit Industrial Holdings, finding no substantial competition harm or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Integration
  • Market Share Assessment
  • Exclusive Distribution Agreements
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2008] ZACT 5

Protea Chemicals (A Division of the Omnia Group (Pty) Ltd) and Zetachem (Pty) Ltd (85/LM/Aug07)

Protea Chemicals (A Division of the Omnia Group (Pty) Ltd) and Zetachem (Pty) Ltd (85/LM/Aug07) [2008] ZACT 5 (17 January 2008)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
85/LM/Aug07
Judges
Y Carrim, U Bhoola, L Reyburn

The Tribunal unconditionally approved the merger between Protea Chemicals and Zetachem, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Merger Analysis
  • Public Interest
  • Market Definition
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2007] ZACT 102

Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited and Orley Foods (Proprietary) Limited (108/LM/OCT07)

Calshelf Investments 152 (Proprietary) Limited and Orley Foods (Proprietary) Limited (108/LM/OCT07) [2007] ZACT 102 (12 December 2007)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
108/LM/OCT07
Judges
DH Lewis, Y Carrim, M Mokuena

The Competition Tribunal approved the merger between Calshelf Investments 152 and Orley Foods without conditions, finding no competitive or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Merger-control
  • Public-interest
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2006] ZACT 44

Fujitsu Siemens Computers (Holding) BV and Siemens Services Newco (Pty) Ltd (26/LM/Mar06)

Fujitsu Siemens Computers (Holding) BV and Siemens Services Newco (Pty) Ltd (26/LM/Mar06) [2006] ZACT 44; [2006] 1 CPLR 135 (CT) (25 May 2006)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
26/LM/Mar06
Judges
Norman Manoim, Merle Holden, Urmila Bhoola

The Competition Tribunal approved Fujitsu Siemens’ acquisition of Siemens IT Services Newco, finding no substantial lessening of competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Market Definition
  • Horizontal Merger Analysis
  • Vertical Integration
  • Public Interest
  • Employment Effects
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.