CEPPWAWU obo Thoka and Another v National Bargaining Council for the Chemical Industry and Others (JR2624/17) [2021] ZALCJHB 379 (19 October 2021)
The Court found that the arbitrator's decision was reasonable and supported by the evidence. The arbitrator properly considered the circumstantial evidence presented by Afrox, including the seal numbers and the employees' bare denial. The arbitrator was entitled to prefer Afrox's version where the employees failed to present a credible alternative. The breakdown of the trust relationship could be inferred from the nature of the misconduct, and CEPPWAWU did not challenge the existence or reasonableness of the relevant rules. The arbitrator also addressed procedural fairness, including the postponement application and the audi alteram partem rule. The applicant failed to establish any basis...
- Citation
- [2021] ZALCJHB 379
- Parties
- Applicant: CEPPWAWU obo Thoka, P & Mbhele, L; Respondent: National Bargaining Council for the Chemical Industry; Respondent: Olota, L N.O.; Respondent: Afrox Limited
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2021
- Case Number
- JR2624/17
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Application to review and set aside the arbitration award is dismissed.
- Judges
- Mahosi
- Legal Topics
- Review of Arbitration Award, Dismissal for Gross Negligence, Procedural Fairness, Breakdown of Trust Relationship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CEPPWAWU obo Thoka, P & Mbhele, L
Applicant
National Bargaining Council for the Chemical Industry
Respondent
Olota, L N.O.
Respondent
Afrox Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator's award was reviewable under section 145 of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the dismissal of the employees for gross negligence was substantively and procedurally fair.
- 3 Whether the arbitrator failed to apply her mind or committed gross irregularities in the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the arbitrator's decision was reasonable and supported by the evidence. The arbitrator properly considered the circumstantial evidence presented by Afrox, including the seal numbers and the employees' bare denial. The arbitrator was entitled to prefer Afrox's version where the employees failed to present a credible alternative. The breakdown of the trust relationship could be inferred from the nature of the misconduct, and CEPPWAWU did not challenge the existence or reasonableness of the relevant rules. The arbitrator also addressed procedural fairness, including the postponement application and the audi alteram partem rule. The applicant failed to establish any basis...
Court Disposition
Application to review and set aside the arbitration award is dismissed.
Orders
- The application to review and set aside the arbitration award dated 5 October 2017, issued by the second respondent under the auspices of the first respondent, under case number GPCHEM196-16/17 is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment