Coleus Packaging (Pty) Ltd and Rheem Crown Plant (a division of Highveld Steel and Vanadium Corporation Limited) (75/LM/Oct02) [2003] ZACT 7 (11 February 2003)
The Tribunal found that the merger would likely result in a substantial lessening of competition in the market for crown closures, primarily due to SAB's dominance as a purchaser and the risk of foreclosure of MCG, the only domestic rival. However, the Tribunal determined that outright prohibition was not viable, as it would likely lead to Rheem's exit from the market and a reduction in domestic supply. The Tribunal accepted that the proposed behavioural conditions, negotiated with input from competitors and the Commission, would adequately address concerns regarding confidentiality, non-discriminatory supply, price parity, and plant innovation. The Tribunal rejected the Commission's...
- Citation
- [2003] ZACT 7
- Parties
- Applicant: Coleus Packaging (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Rheem Crown Plant, a division of Highveld Steel and Vanadium Corporation Limited
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2003
- Case Number
- 75/LM/Oct02
- Procedural Posture
- Large Merger / Merger Approval Hearing
- Outcome
- Merger approved subject to detailed behavioural conditions.
- Judges
- N. Manoim, D.H. Lewis, Prof. M. Holden
- Legal Topics
- Vertical Merger, Customer Foreclosure, Input Foreclosure, Behavioural Remedies, Black Economic Empowerment, Market Definition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coleus Packaging (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Rheem Crown Plant, a division of Highveld Steel and Vanadium Corporation Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Large Merger / Merger Approval Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed vertical merger would substantially lessen competition in the market for crown closures for glass bottles.
- 2 Whether the merger would result in customer or input foreclosure, harming competitors and customers.
- 3 Whether behavioural conditions can adequately ameliorate the anticompetitive effects of the merger.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the merger would likely result in a substantial lessening of competition in the market for crown closures, primarily due to SAB's dominance as a purchaser and the risk of foreclosure of MCG, the only domestic rival. However, the Tribunal determined that outright prohibition was not viable, as it would likely lead to Rheem's exit from the market and a reduction in domestic supply. The Tribunal accepted that the proposed behavioural conditions, negotiated with input from competitors and the Commission, would adequately address concerns regarding confidentiality, non-discriminatory supply, price parity, and plant innovation. The Tribunal rejected the Commission's...
Court Disposition
Merger approved subject to detailed behavioural conditions.
Orders
- SAB must dispose of not less than 40% of Coleus's issued share capital to a suitable black empowerment partner within two years, subject to rehabilitation of the crown plant.
- SAB and Coleus must furnish the Commission with six-monthly written reports regarding rehabilitation progress, commencing 1 October 2003.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment